LEADER 00999nam a2200277 i 4500 001 991001579649707536 005 20020502190519.0 008 950307s1988 it ||| | ita 020 $a8870030202 035 $ab10872760-39ule_inst 035 $aLE02372183$9ExL 040 $aDip.to Studi Storici$bita 082 0 $a759.5 100 1 $aGuercino$071551 245 12$aI dipinti del Guercino /$cLuigi Salerno 260 $aRoma :$bU. Bozzi,$cc1988 300 $axviii, 450 p. :$bill. (alcune col.) ;$c29 cm. 500 $aBibliografia p. 433-438. 650 4$aGuercino$y1591-1666$xCatalogo 700 1 $aSalerno, Luigi$eauthor$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$037250 907 $a.b10872760$b21-09-06$c28-06-02 912 $a991001579649707536 945 $aLE023 759.5 GUE 1 3$g1$i2023000019603$lle023$o-$pE0.00$q-$rn$so $t0$u2$v0$w2$x0$y.i10980982$z28-06-02 996 $aDipinti del Guercino$91456178 997 $aUNISALENTO 998 $ale023$b01-01-95$cm$da $e-$fita$git $h2$i1 LEADER 03939nam 22006852 450 001 9910785521603321 005 20151005020622.0 010 $a1-139-56481-1 010 $a1-316-09015-9 010 $a1-283-57521-3 010 $a1-139-20873-X 010 $a1-139-55127-2 010 $a9786613887665 010 $a1-139-55623-1 010 $a1-139-55253-8 010 $a1-139-55002-0 010 $a1-139-55498-0 035 $a(CKB)2670000000234787 035 $a(EBL)989118 035 $a(OCoLC)811489716 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000737008 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11473675 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000737008 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10782364 035 $a(PQKB)11741449 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9781139208734 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC989118 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL989118 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10591076 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL388766 035 $a(OCoLC)834608098 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000234787 100 $a20141103d2012|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aDeclaring war $eCongress, the president, and what the constitution does not say /$fBrien Hallett, University of Hawai?i-Manoa, Matsunaga Institute of Peace$b[electronic resource] 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2012. 215 $a1 online resource (xvii, 273 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 $a1-107-60857-0 311 $a1-107-02692-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aMachine generated contents note: 1. A constitutional tyranny and presidential dictatorship; Part I. What Is the History?: 2. How the president declares war: the War of 1812; 3. Why the Congress ought not declare war: the Spanish-American War, 1898; 4. A plan for acquiescence: the War Powers Resolution of 1973; Part II. What Is a Declaration of War?: 5. Declaring and commanding: forms, functions, and relationships; 6. Lawful and unlawful declarations of war: quantity over quality; 7. Six possible structures; Part III. What Are the Solutions?: 8. A constitutional amendment; 9. A congressional work-around; Part IV. What Is the Theory?: 10. Bellum justum et pium: the rule of law and roman piety; 11. The rule of law: searching for ontology; 12. Senator Malcolm Wallop; Appendix I. Five congressional declarations of war and one appropriations act; Appendix II. The federative powers in parliamentary governments. 330 $aDeclaring War directly challenges the 200-year-old belief that Congress can and should declare war. By offering a detailed analysis of the declarations of 1812, 1898 and the War Powers Resolution of 1973, the book demonstrates the extent of the organizational and moral incapacity of Congress to declare war. It invokes Carl von Clausewitz's dictum that 'war is policy' to explain why declarations of war are an integral part of war and proposes two possible remedies - a constitutional amendment or, alternatively, a significant re-organization of Congress. It offers a comprehensive historical, legal, constitutional, moral and philosophical analysis of why Congress has failed to check an imperial presidency. The book draws on Roman history and international law to clarify the form, function and language of declarations of war and John Austin's speech act theory. 606 $aWar, Declaration of$zUnited States 606 $aWar and emergency powers$zUnited States 615 0$aWar, Declaration of 615 0$aWar and emergency powers 676 $a342.73/062 686 $aLAW018000$2bisacsh 700 $aHallett$b Brien$01468093 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910785521603321 996 $aDeclaring war$93819058 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04296nam 2200493 450 001 9910822069803321 005 20230817191820.0 010 $a1421428725 010 $a9781421428727 010 $a1421428717 010 $a9781421428710 035 $a(CKB)4100000007745716 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5721120 035 $a(OCoLC)1105530863 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse76371 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5721120 035 $a(OCoLC)1088892184 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000007745716 100 $a20190319d2019 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aFat in the fifties $eAmerica's first obesity crisis /$fNicolas Rasmussen 210 1$aBaltimore :$cJohns Hopkins University Press,$d2019. 215 $a1 online resource (199 pages) 311 $a1-4214-2871-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aFat and the public health before the second World War -- Obesity becomes a mental disorder -- The postwar heart alarm : new attention to an old hazard -- Fighting heart disease one calorie at a time in cold war suburbia -- The new epidemiology and its impact -- The disappearance of obesity as a public health problem. 330 $a"A riveting history of the rise and fall of the obesity epidemic during 1950s and 1960s America. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company identified obesity as the leading cause of premature death in the United States in the 1930s, but it wasn't until 1951 that the public health and medical communities finally recognized it as "America's Number One Health Problem." The reason for MetLife's interest? They wanted their policyholders to live longer and continue paying their premiums. Early postwar America responded to the obesity emergency, but by the end of the 1960s, the crisis waned and official rates of true obesity were reduced? despite the fact that Americans were growing no thinner. What mid-century factors and forces established obesity as a politically meaningful and culturally resonant problem in the first place? And why did obesity fade from public?and medical?consciousness only a decade later? Based on archival records of health leaders as well as medical and popular literature, Fat in the Fifties is the first book to reconstruct the prewar origins, emergence, and surprising disappearance of obesity as a major public health problem. Author Nicolas Rasmussen explores the postwar shifts that drew attention to obesity, as well as the varied approaches to its treatment: from thyroid hormones to psychoanalysis and weight loss groups. Rasmussen argues that the US government was driven by the new Cold War and the fear of atomic annihilation to heightened anxieties about national fitness. Informed by the latest psychiatric thinking?which diagnosed obesity as the result of oral fixation, just like alcoholism?health professionals promoted a form of weight loss group therapy modeled on Alcoholics Anonymous. The intervention caught on like wildfire in 1950s suburbia. But the sense of crisis passed quickly, partly due to cultural changes associated with the later 1960s and partly due to scientific research, some of it sponsored by the sugar industry, emphasizing particular dietary fats, rather than calorie intake. Through this riveting history of the rise and fall of the obesity epidemic, readers gain an understanding of how the American public health system?ambitious, strong, and second-to-none at the end of the Second World War?was constrained a decade later to focus mainly on nagging individuals to change their lifestyle choices. Fat in the Fifties is required reading for public health practitioners and researchers, physicians, historians of medicine, and anyone concerned about weight and weight loss." -- Publisher's description. 517 1 $aAmerica's first obesity crisis 606 $aObesity$xHistory 607 $aUnited States 615 0$aObesity$xHistory. 676 $a362.1963/9800973 700 $aRasmussen$b Nicolas$f1962-$01686263 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910822069803321 996 $aFat in the fifties$94058977 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04411nam 22006133 450 001 9910838355903321 005 20230629214424.0 010 $a0-309-49956-9 010 $a0-309-49892-9 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6843020 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL6843020 035 $a(CKB)20462119600041 035 $a(EXLCZ)9920462119600041 100 $a20220110d2022 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aNecessary DoD Range Capabilities to Ensure Operational Superiority of U. S. Defense Systems $eTesting for the Future Fight 210 1$aWashington, D.C. :$cNational Academies Press,$d2022. 210 4$dİ2021. 215 $a1 online resource (151 pages) 311 08$aPrint version: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Necessary DoD Range Capabilities to Ensure Operational Superiority of U. S. Defense Systems Washington, D.C. : National Academies Press,c2022 9780309498579 327 $aAn Envisioned Future of Operational Test and Evaluation -- Testing for Future Combat : Multi-Domain Operations, Connected Concurrent Kill Chains, and Mitigating Encroachment -- Digital Infrastructure Needs for Operational Testing -- Speed-to-Field : Restructuring the Requirements and Resources Processes for DoD Test Ranges -- Conclusion and Summary of Recommendations by Actor. 330 $a"Rigorous operational testing (OT) of weapon systems procured by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) is fundamental to ensuring that these sophisticated systems not only meet their stated requirements, but also perform under realistic operational conditions when faced by determined adversaries employing their own highly capable offensive and defensive weaponry. DoD's test and training range enterprise provides the geography, infrastructure, technology, expertise, processes, and management that make safe, secure, and comprehensive OT possible. The challenges facing the nation's range infrastructure are both increasing and accelerating. Limited test capacity in physical resources and workforce, the age of test infrastructure, the capability to test advanced technologies, and encroachment impact the ability to inform system performance, integrated system performance and the overall pace of testing. Necessary DoD Range Capabilities to Ensure Operational Superiority of U.S. Defense Systems assesses the physical and technical suitability of DoD test and evaluation ranges, infrastructure, and tools for determining the operational effectiveness, suitability, survivability, and lethality of military systems. This report explores modernization, sustainment, operations, and resource challenges for test and evaluation ranges, and makes recommendations to put the DoD range enterprise on a modernization trajectory to meet the needs of OT in the years ahead."--Publisher's website. 606 $aMilitary planning$zUnited States$xMethodology 606 $aMilitary art and science$zUnited States 606 $aNational security$zUnited States 606 $aPlanification militaire$zE?tats-Unis$xMe?thodologie 606 $aArt et science militaires$zE?tats-Unis 606 $aMilitary art and science$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst01020874 606 $aMilitary planning$xMethodology$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst01021382 606 $aNational security$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst01033711 607 $aUnited States$2fast 615 0$aMilitary planning$xMethodology. 615 0$aMilitary art and science 615 0$aNational security 615 6$aPlanification militaire$xMe?thodologie. 615 6$aArt et science militaires 615 7$aMilitary art and science. 615 7$aMilitary planning$xMethodology. 615 7$aNational security. 700 $aNational Academies of Sciences$b Engineering, and Medicine$01596851 701 $aSciences$b Division on Engineering and Physical$01651736 701 $aDevelopment$b Board on Army Research and$01731718 701 $aInfrastructure$b Committee on Assessing the Physical and Technical Suitability of DoD Test and Evaluation Ranges and$01731719 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910838355903321 996 $aNecessary DoD Range Capabilities to Ensure Operational Superiority of U. S. Defense Systems$94144818 997 $aUNINA