LEADER 03386nam  2200685Ia 450 
001 9910785448203321
005 20230725025718.0
010   $a1-315-58885-4
010   $a1-317-11578-3
010   $a1-317-11577-5
010   $a1-282-94823-7
010   $a9786612948237
010   $a0-7546-9724-X
035   $a(CKB)2670000000060561
035   $a(EBL)623990
035   $a(OCoLC)699474804
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000438198
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12162630
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000438198
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10452876
035   $a(PQKB)10768520
035   $a(OCoLC)698590035
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL623990
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10433682
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL924673
035   $a(OCoLC)755925933
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC623990
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000060561
100   $a20100804d2010      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aInstitutional failures$b[electronic resource] $eDuke lacrosse, universities, the media, and the legal system /$fedited by Howard M. Wasserman
210   $aBurlington, VT $cAshgate$dc2010
215   $a1 online resource (223 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-7546-7873-3 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aCover; Contents; List of Contributors; Acknowledgements; Part I Overview; 1 An Institutional Perspective on the Duke Lacrosse Case; Part II Legal System; 2 When Good Prosecutors Go Bad: From Prosecutorial Discretion to Prosecutorial Misconduct; 3 Duke Lacrosse, Prosecutorial Misconduct, and the Limits of the Civil Justice System; Part III Duke University and American Higher Education; 4 The Perils of Academic Groupthink; 5 The Duke Lacrosse Saga: Administration versus Students and Faculty, among Others; 6 In the Shadow of Duke: College Sport and the Academy Divided; Part IV News Media
327   $a7 Justice Delayed8 Not Just Sloppy Journalism, but a Profound Ethical Failure: Media Coverage of the Duke Lacrosse Case; 9 Covering the Notorious Case: Narrative and the Need for Sensationalism Done Well; Bibliography; Index
330   $aThe authors of this new collection argue that the many disparate facets of the now-infamous Duke University lacrosse controversy are best understood in the context of the three major socio-legal institutions in which this drama played out: the legal system, the American university, and the news media. These essays consider the role these institutions played in this case, and the lessons it might teach about the appropriate conduct and function of each of them.
606   $aProsecutorial misconduct$zNorth Carolina$zDurham
606   $aMalicious accusation$zNorth Carolina$zDurham
606   $aRape$xInvestigation$zNorth Carolina$zDurham
606   $aMass media and criminal justice$zUnited States
615  0$aProsecutorial misconduct
615  0$aMalicious accusation
615  0$aRape$xInvestigation
615  0$aMass media and criminal justice
676   $a364.15/3209756563
701   $aWasserman$b Howard M$01525595
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910785448203321
996   $aInstitutional failures$93767089
997   $aUNINA