LEADER 03848nam  22007572  450 
001 9910785434503321
005 20151005020621.0
010   $a0-511-86198-2
010   $a1-107-21388-6
010   $a1-282-94194-1
010   $a9786612941948
010   $a0-511-76116-3
010   $a0-511-85974-0
010   $a0-511-85887-6
010   $a0-511-86061-7
010   $a0-511-85800-0
010   $a0-511-85713-6
035   $a(CKB)2670000000060172
035   $a(EBL)615804
035   $a(OCoLC)693761366
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000439391
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11305128
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000439391
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10464325
035   $a(PQKB)11760942
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511761164
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC615804
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL615804
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10437616
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL294194
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000060172
100   $a20141103d2011||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aMarketing intelligent design $elaw and the creationist agenda /$fFrank S. Ravitch$b[electronic resource]
210  1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2011.
215   $a1 online resource (xv, 344 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
311   $a0-521-13926-0 
311   $a0-521-19153-X 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aDesigning design -- Big D and manufactured paradigm shifts -- The law and intelligent design -- Theistic evolution -- Dawkins's dilemma -- No intelligence allowed or no intelligible science? -- The Madison Avenue approach to law and science -- Conclusion.
330   $aRecently a new battle has emerged between science and religion. The battle has focused on intelligent design (ID) and the numerous legal, philosophical and educational concerns surrounding it. Resolution of these concerns centers on two questions: Is ID science? And is ID religion? Despite the fact that ID does not meet the standards of scientific rigor, ID proponents have been able to create a remarkably well-designed marketing plan aimed at imposing a theistic naturalism in schools and scientific discourse. Both the ID movement and some of its most vociferous opponents have a vested interest in suggesting that science, especially evolutionary biology, and religion are incompatible. This book presents a philosophical and legal counterpoint by demonstrating the compatibility between religion and evolutionary biology and the incompatibility between ID and mainstream science.
606   $aCreationism$xStudy and teaching$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States
606   $aEvolution (Biology)$xStudy and teaching$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States
606   $aIntelligent design (Teleology)$xStudy and teaching$zUnited States
606   $aCreationism$xStudy and teaching$zUnited States
606   $aEvolution (Biology)$xStudy and teaching$zUnited States
606   $aReligion in the public schools$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States
615  0$aCreationism$xStudy and teaching$xLaw and legislation
615  0$aEvolution (Biology)$xStudy and teaching$xLaw and legislation
615  0$aIntelligent design (Teleology)$xStudy and teaching
615  0$aCreationism$xStudy and teaching
615  0$aEvolution (Biology)$xStudy and teaching
615  0$aReligion in the public schools$xLaw and legislation
676   $a231.7/652
700   $aRavitch$b Frank S.$f1966-$0790803
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910785434503321
996   $aMarketing intelligent design$93722768
997   $aUNINA