LEADER 03750nam 2200613 450 001 9910785364703321 005 20230725025449.0 010 $a1-282-87629-5 010 $a9786612876295 010 $a1-4411-8230-6 035 $a(CKB)2670000000056423 035 $a(EBL)602023 035 $a(OCoLC)680039351 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000422187 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11282588 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000422187 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10432895 035 $a(PQKB)11533675 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC602023 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5309684 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3003071 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3003071 035 $a(OCoLC)928191849 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000056423 100 $a20180315h20102010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aLiterature, in theory $etropes, subjectivities, responses & responsibilities /$fJulian Wolfreys 210 1$aLondon, [England] ;$aNew York, New York :$cContinuum,$d2010. 210 4$d©2010 215 $a1 online resource (321 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-4411-2324-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aContents; Acknowledgements; Foreword, in Lieu of an Introduction; 1 Toward a Phenomenology of Urban Gothic: The Example of Dickens; 2 Houses, Homes, Rooms and Tombs: The Unhomely Spaces and Monstrous Economies of Dombey and Son; 3 In Visibility, or the Appearance of 'True Histories': Truth, Confession and Revelation in Anne Bronte?; 4 Contested Grounds: Historical, Epistemological and Political Identities in Nineteenth-Century Literature; 5 (Sub) Urbi et Orbi: The 'Little Worlds' of London, or, Fear, Whimsy and Singularity; 6 Professions: Of English Diaspora? 327 $a7 No, Not, None, Nothing, Nobody: Place, Pattern, Death and Narratives of Negation in Dubliners8 'A self-referential density': Glyph, Fictions of Transgression and the 'Theory' Thing; 9 'Theory' & the novel (and The Novel?); 10 Ghosts: Of Ourselves, or, Drifting with Hardy and Heidegger; 11 The Reiterable Circularity Of Being: Poetics, Selfhood and the Singular Witness that is 'I'; 12 Teaching Derrida: 'but just a minute, before we begin, a preface of sorts (after the event), a defence, apologia, apologue . . .', and other responses in the face of (yet another) programmed avoida 327 $a13 'The strong dead return': Harold Bloom's Daemonic Shades14 Face to Face with Agamben or, the Other in Love; 15 Responsibilities of J, or, Aphorism's Other: Criticism's Transformation; Endnotes; Bibliography; Index of Proper Names 330 $aJacques Derrida has argued about the difference between literature and theory that despite its institutional status, part of its 'institution' is the right of literature to say anything. Literature cannot be defined as such, and as soon as one seeks to produce a reading of the literary, complications arise. . Yet despite its institutional significance, 'theory' remains something many wish would go away; and which, for others, is still not read, is misread, and remains to be read. Like literature, it remains as an enigmatic identity, resistant to definition, but subject to misperceptions and op 606 $aLiterature$xHistory and criticism$xTheory, etc 615 0$aLiterature$xHistory and criticism$xTheory, etc. 676 $a801.95 686 $a17.80$2bcl 686 $a17.81$2bcl 700 $aWolfreys$b Julian$f1958-$0856701 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910785364703321 996 $aLiterature, in theory$93832302 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03801nam 2200481 450 001 9910795627103321 005 20220709171037.0 010 $a90-04-46977-X 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004469778 035 $a(CKB)5490000000108279 035 $z(OCoLC)1256627463 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004469778 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6768869 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL6768869 035 $a(PPN)260584029 035 $a(EXLCZ)995490000000108279 100 $a20220709d2021 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurun####uuuua 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 12$aA cognitive semantic study of biblical Hebrew $ethe root s?lm for completeness-balance /$fby Andrew Chin Hei Leong 210 1$aLeiden, The Netherlands ;$aBoston :$cBrill,$d[2021] 210 4$d©2021 215 $a1 online resource 225 1 $aStudies in Semitic languages and linguistics ;$vVolume 104 311 $a90-04-46975-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aAcknowledgements -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Abbreviations -- Introduction -- 1? A Survey of Previously Conducted Research -- 2? The Semitic Cognates of ??? -- 3? Research Question -- 4? Limitations of Our Research -- 5? Outline of the Book -- 1 Methodology -- 1? Theoretical Question: Homonymy and Polysemy -- 2? Methodological Discussion -- 3? Illustration of the Methodology by Way of Examples -- 4? Specificity of the Present Study Vis-à-Vis Contemporary Semantic Studies -- 2 The ??? D Stem -- 1? To Give Back: To Reach a Balance (between Two Parties) -- 2? To Retribute: To Reach Balance (Involving Three Parties) -- 3? Retribution as Balance -- 4? Cruces Interpretum -- 3 The ??? G Stem -- 1? To Be Complete and To Be Finished -- 2? To Make an Alliance, To Be an Ally -- 3? Two Homonymous Verbs or One Polysemous Verb? -- 4 The ??? H Stem -- 1? To Make (Something) Complete / Finished -- 2? To Enter an Alliance (with Someone) -- 3? Observation on the Prepositions -- 4? Conclusion -- 5 Synthesis of the Semasiological Investigation of ??? -- 1? The ??? D Stem -- 2? The ??? G Stem -- 3? The ??? H Stem -- 4? A Unified Polysemous ??? -- 5? Relations between Stem-Formations -- 6? Comparison with the Semitic Cognates -- 6 Wider Perspectives -- 1? Research Results -- 2? Onomasiological Study of the Polysemy of ??? -- 3? Nominal and Adjectival Forms of the Root ??? -- Conclusion -- 1? Semantic and Methodological Notes -- 2? Theological Issues: Retribution and Peace -- Bibliography -- Index. 330 $aSemantic studies of the Biblical Hebrew verb ???? have been influenced by those of its most invoked nominal form ????????. In this volume Andrew Chin Hei Leong shows that the concepts of balance, alliance, and completeness form the basic semantic structure of ????. Previous studies on ???? employed either historical or textual methodology, which has been dominant in biblical lexical studies. In addition to these methods, in Leong develops a systematic semantic methodology from Cognitive Semantics and Frame Semantics, to demonstrate that it is balance, rather than completeness, that is the most central concept in holding the semantic network together. 410 0$aStudies in Semitic languages and linguistics ;$vVolume 104. 606 $aShlm (The Hebrew root) 615 0$aShlm (The Hebrew root) 676 $a492.456 700 $aLeong$b Andrew Chin Hei$01535691 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910795627103321 996 $aA cognitive semantic study of biblical Hebrew$93784046 997 $aUNINA