LEADER 02308nam  2200565Ia 450 
001 9910785326503321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-282-92188-6
010   $a9786612921889
010   $a0-7391-4724-2
035   $a(CKB)2670000000059479
035   $a(EBL)634255
035   $a(OCoLC)699511293
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000440706
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12210895
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000440706
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10492629
035   $a(PQKB)10130954
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC634255
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL634255
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10435029
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL292188
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000059479
100   $a20100621d2010      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aPersecution or toleration$b[electronic resource] $ean explication of the Locke-Proast quarrel, 1689-1704 /$fAdam Wolfson
210   $aLanham, MD $cLexington Books$dc2010
215   $a1 online resource (160 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-7391-4722-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aAcknowledgments; Introduction; 1; 2; 3; 4; 5
330   $aThis book traces, in detail, the complex contours of the Locke-Proast debate over the question of toleration-revealing the radical case John Locke made on behalf of toleration. Arguing against the pro-persecution arguments of Jonas Proast, Locke developed a broadly humanistic case for toleration rooted in liberal notions of consent, human dependency, and skepticism. Locke's theory would extend to a wide range of religious believers and even atheists. However, at the same time, according to Locke, toleration requires an overcoming of the religious worldview, rather than an emergence out of theo
606   $aReligious tolerance$xHistory$y17th century
606   $aToleration
615  0$aReligious tolerance$xHistory
615  0$aToleration.
676   $a261.7/209032
700   $aWolfson$b Adam$f1962-$01475554
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910785326503321
996   $aPersecution or toleration$93689786
997   $aUNINA