LEADER 03839nam 2200697Ia 450 001 9910785299303321 005 20230725024714.0 010 $a0-292-79276-X 024 7 $a10.7560/721975 035 $a(CKB)2670000000039093 035 $a(OCoLC)649473789 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10392320 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000423653 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11270531 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000423653 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10441208 035 $a(PQKB)11535010 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3443486 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse2438 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3443486 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10392320 035 $a(DE-B1597)588075 035 $a(OCoLC)1286808838 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780292792760 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000039093 100 $a20090806d2010 ub 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aMuslim reformers in Iran and Turkey$b[electronic resource] $ethe paradox of moderation /$fGu?nes? Murat Tezcu?r 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aAustin $cUniversity of Texas Press$d2010 215 $a1 online resource (321 p.) 225 1 $aModern Middle East series ;$vno. 25 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a0-292-72197-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aFrom Islamists to Muslim reformers : a theory of political change -- Muslim reformism in comparative perspective -- Muslim reformism : engagement with secularism and liberal democracy -- The guardians and elections in Iran and Turkey -- A moment of enthusiasm in the Islamic Republic -- Elusive democratization in the secular republic -- A tale of two elections. 330 $aModeration theory describes the process through which radical political actors develop commitments to electoral competition, political pluralism, human rights, and rule of law and come to prefer negotiation, reconciliation, and electoral politics over provocation, confrontation, and contentious action. Revisiting this theory through an examination of two of the most prominent moderate Islamic political forces in recent history, Muslim Reformers in Iran and Turkey analyzes the gains made and methods implemented by the Reform Front in the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Justice and Development Party in Turkey. Both of these groups represent Muslim reformers who came into continual conflict with unelected adversaries who attempted to block their reformist agendas. Based on extensive field research in both locales, Muslim Reformers in Iran and Turkey argues that behavioral moderation as practiced by these groups may actually inhibit democratic progress. Political scientist Güne? Murat Tezcür observes that the ability to implement conciliatory tactics, organize electoral parties, and make political compromises impeded democracy when pursued by the Reform Front and the Justice and Development Party. Challenging conventional wisdom, Tezcür's findings have broad implications for the dynamics of democratic progress. 410 0$aModern Middle East series (Austin, Tex.) ;$vno. 25. 606 $aIslam and politics$zIran 606 $aIslam and politics$zTurkey 606 $aLiberalism$zIran 606 $aLiberalism$zTurkey 607 $aIran$xPolitics and government$y1997- 607 $aTurkey$xPolitics and government$y1980- 615 0$aIslam and politics 615 0$aIslam and politics 615 0$aLiberalism 615 0$aLiberalism 676 $a322/.10955 700 $aTezcu?r$b Gu?nes? Murat$f1979-$01467899 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910785299303321 996 $aMuslim reformers in Iran and Turkey$93678779 997 $aUNINA