LEADER 03321nam  22006734a 450 
001 9910785234903321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-282-86804-7
010   $a9786612868047
010   $a0-567-15624-9
035   $a(CKB)2670000000054954
035   $a(EBL)601644
035   $a(OCoLC)676698426
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000412038
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12101516
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000412038
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10366501
035   $a(PQKB)11295630
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC601644
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL601644
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10427337
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL286804
035   $a(OCoLC)893334395
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000054954
100   $a20091001d2009      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 14$aThe Aramaic and Egyptian legal traditions at Elephantine$b[electronic resource] $ean Egyptological approach /$fAlejandro F. Botta
210   $aLondon ;$aNew York, NY $cT & T Clark$dc2009
215   $a1 online resource (256 p.)
225 1 $aLibrary of Second Temple studies ;$v64
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-567-12036-8 
311   $a0-567-04533-1 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [204]-233]) and index.
327   $aContents; List of Tables; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION: THE EGYPTOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF ARAMAIC LEGAL FORMULAE; Chapter 2 THE ELEPHANTINE COMMUNITY AND ARAMAIC LAW; Chapter 3 THE EGYPTIAN FORMULARY TRADITION; Chapter 4 CHALLENGING THE CONSENSUS: THE (omitted) CLAUSE; Chapter 5 THE 'WITHDRAWAL' AND RELATED FORMULAE IN THE ARAMAIC LEGAL TRADITION; Chapter 6 THE USE OF w(omitted)y IN THE EGYPTIAN LEGAL TRADITION; Chapter 7 A COMPARISON OF THE ARAMAIC AND EGYPTIAN USES OF WITHDRAWAL FORMULAE
327   $aChapter 8 RECONSIDERING THE ORIGINS OF ARAMAIC AND DEMOTIC LEGAL FORMULAEWORKS CITED; INDEX
330   $aThis is a study of the interrelationships between the formulary traditions of the legal documents of the Jewish colony of Elephantine and the legal formulary traditions of their Egyptian counterparts.  . The legal documents of Elephantine have been approached in three different ways thus far: first, comparing them to the later Aramaic legal tradition; second, as part of a self-contained system, and more recently from the point of view of the Assyriological legal tradition. However, there is still a fourth possible approach, which has long been neglected by scholars in this field, and that is t
410  0$aLibrary of Second Temple studies ;$v64.
606   $aLaw$zEgypt$zElephantine$xHistory$yTo 1500
606   $aManuscripts, Aramaic (Papyri)$zEgypt$zElephantine
606   $aLaw, Ancient
606   $aJewish law$xHistory$yTo 1500
615  0$aLaw$xHistory
615  0$aManuscripts, Aramaic (Papyri)
615  0$aLaw, Ancient.
615  0$aJewish law$xHistory
676   $a340.532
700   $aBotta$b Alejandro F.$f1960-$01481312
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910785234903321
996   $aThe Aramaic and Egyptian legal traditions at Elephantine$93698178
997   $aUNINA