LEADER 02475nam 2200613Ia 450 001 9910784893603321 005 20230428212319.0 010 $a0-19-773042-6 010 $a1-280-52810-9 010 $a0-19-535700-0 010 $a1-4294-0665-8 035 $a(CKB)1000000000400071 035 $a(EBL)271498 035 $a(OCoLC)476007399 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000158111 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11151240 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000158111 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10147603 035 $a(PQKB)11612078 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL271498 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10278319 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL52810 035 $a(OCoLC)935260421 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC271498 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000400071 100 $a19950228d1996 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aFree public reason $emaking it up as we go /$fFred D'Agostino 210 $aNew York $cOxford University Press$d1996 215 $a1 online resource (xii, 203 pages) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 0 $a0-19-509761-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 185-191) and index. 327 $aContents; 1. Introduction; 1. Pre?cis; 2. Retrospective; 3. Prospective; 2. Some Apparatus; 3. The Idea of Public Justification; 4. Some Conceptions of Public Justification; 5. The Ideal of Public Justification; 6. Prima Facie Incoherence; 7. Overarching Principles and Perspectives?; 8. Responses to and Diagnosis of Prima Facie Incoherence; 9. 'Solving' the Problem; 10. Assessing the Solution; 11. Conclusion; Bibliography; Index 330 $aThis study examines the idea of public justification, stressing its importance but also questioning the coherence of the concept itself. D'Agostino shows that the concept is composed of various values, interests and notions regarding the common good. 606 $aPolitical science$xPhilosophy 606 $aJustification (Theory of knowledge) 606 $aReason 615 0$aPolitical science$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aJustification (Theory of knowledge) 615 0$aReason. 676 $a32001 700 $aD'Agostino$b Fred$052746 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910784893603321 996 $aFree public reason$91681083 997 $aUNINA