LEADER 04221nam 22006731 450 001 9910784283703321 005 20070411115139.0 010 $a1-4725-6381-6 010 $a1-280-82933-8 010 $a9786610829330 010 $a1-84731-289-6 024 7 $a10.5040/9781472563811 035 $a(CKB)1000000000338409 035 $a(EBL)295184 035 $a(OCoLC)437181726 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000205088 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12047970 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000205088 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10192419 035 $a(PQKB)10119787 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1772586 035 $a(OCoLC)191806934 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09256374 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC295184 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL295184 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000338409 100 $a20140929d2006 fy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aMonetary remedies for breach of human rights $ea comparative study /$fLisa Tortell 210 1$aOxford ;$aPortland, Oregon :$cHart Publishing,$d2006. 215 $a1 online resource (236 p.) 225 1 $aHuman rights law in perspective ;$vv. 9 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-84113-511-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aHalf Title Page; Half Title verso; Title Page; Title verso; Series Editor's Preface; Acknowledgements; Contents; Table of Cases; 1. Introduction; Part I: Jurisdictions; 2. United States of America: Section 1983 and Bivens; 3. India: Article 32; 4. New Zealand: Baigent's Case; Part II: Comparative Analysis; 5. Structure of the Cause of Action; 6. Overarching Influences; Part III: Turning the Analysis Around; 7. The United Kingdom Human Rights Act 1998; 8. Conclusion; Index. 330 $a"This book constructs a framework which allows a greater understanding of domestic causes of action for breaches of human rights sounding in a monetary remedy. The first part describes the cause of action in three jurisdictions: the United States of America, India and New Zealand. The second part discusses two insights resulting from a comparative analysis of these three jurisdictions. The first is a list of four common questions that, when answered, structure the cause of action. These questions address what the cause of action protects, who the cause of action protects, against whom the cause of action is directed, and what the court orders. The second is a list of four overarching influences that affected the answers given to those questions in the three jurisdictions, so completing the structure of the causes of action. These influences are the cause of action's source, age, wider context and internal context. Putting these two chapters together provides a generalised outline of the causes of action. In the third part of the book the analysis is turned around. The generalised framework is assessed as a way in which to categorise the development and shape of the cause of action in England under the Human Rights Act 1998. The book concludes that a generic structure of the cause of action is common to the three jurisdictions studied and that the differences between the jurisdictions can be explained by influences that affect the causes of action in different ways. Further, this generalised framework is of relevance beyond the three jurisdictions from which it was drawn; it can be used as a guide by other jurisdictions in which such a cause of action either exists or will develop in the future."--Bloomsbury Publishing. 410 0$aHuman rights law in perspective ;$vv. 9. 606 $aCauses of actions 606 $aCivil rights 606 $aCompensation (Law) 606 $aRemedies (Law) 606 $2International human rights law 615 0$aCauses of actions. 615 0$aCivil rights. 615 0$aCompensation (Law) 615 0$aRemedies (Law) 676 $a342.085 700 $aTortell$b Lisa Ann$01561247 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910784283703321 996 $aMonetary remedies for breach of human rights$93827801 997 $aUNINA