LEADER 03527nam 22006971c 450 001 9910784277703321 005 20200115203623.0 010 $a1-4725-5948-7 010 $a1-280-80123-9 010 $a9786610801237 010 $a1-84731-238-1 024 7 $a10.5040/9781472559487 035 $a(CKB)1000000000338478 035 $a(EBL)285428 035 $a(OCoLC)181845746 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000104529 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11999488 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000104529 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10084907 035 $a(PQKB)10022727 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1772573 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1772573 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10276211 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL80123 035 $a(OCoLC)893332179 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09258047 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC285428 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL285428 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000338478 100 $a20150227d2003 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe appeal of internal review $elaw, administrative justice, and the (non-) emergence of disputes $fDavid Cowan and Simon Halliday with Caroline Hunter, Paul Maginn, and Lisa Naylor 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aOxford $aPortland, Oregon $cHart Publishing $d2003. 215 $a1 online resource (232 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-84113-383-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages [213]-220) 327 $a1 INTRODUCTION -- 2 HOMELESSNESS LAW AND INTERNAL REVIEW IN CONTEXT -- 3 SOUTHFIELD COUNCIL -- 4 BRISFORD COUNCIL -- 5 UNDERSTANDING THE FAILURE TO PURSUE INTERNAL REVIEW -- 6 UNDERSTANDING THE PURSUIT OF INTERNAL REVIEW -- 7 LAWYERS AND OTHER COPING STRATEGIES -- 8 CONCLUSION 330 8 $aWhy do most welfare applicants fail to challenge adverse decisions despite a continuing sense of need? The book addresses this severely under-researched and under-theorised question. Using English homelessness law as their case study,the authors explore why homeless applicants did -- but more often did not -- challenge adverse decisions by seeking internal administrative review. They draw out from their data a list of the barriers to the take up of grievance rights. Further, by combining extensive interview data from aggrieved homeless applicants with ethnographic data about bureaucratic decision-making, they are able to situate these barriers within the dynamics of the citizen-bureaucracy relationship. Additionally, they point to other contexts which inform applicants' decisions about whether to request an internal review. Drawing on a diverse literature -- risk, trust, audit, legal consciousness, and complaints -- the authors lay the foundations for our understanding of the (non-)emergence of administrative disputes 606 $aPublic welfare administration$xLaw and legislation$zEngland 606 $2Constitutional & administrative law 606 $aAdministrative remedies$zEngland 606 $aHomeless persons$zEngland 615 0$aPublic welfare administration$xLaw and legislation 615 0$aAdministrative remedies 615 0$aHomeless persons 676 $a342.066 700 $aCowan$b David$g(David S.)$0644482 702 $aHalliday$b Simon 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 801 2$bUkLoBP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910784277703321 996 $aThe appeal of internal review$93801488 997 $aUNINA