LEADER 04612nam 22006611c 450 001 9910784262303321 005 20200115203623.0 010 $a1-4725-5891-X 010 $a1-280-80077-1 010 $a9786610800773 010 $a1-84731-187-3 024 7 $a10.5040/9781472558916 035 $a(CKB)1000000000338597 035 $a(EBL)285402 035 $a(OCoLC)232368759 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000186470 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12047206 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000186470 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10252744 035 $a(PQKB)11019911 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1750725 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC285402 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1750725 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10276249 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL80077 035 $a(OCoLC)893331196 035 $a(OCoLC)181845717 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09255761 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL285402 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000338597 100 $a20140929d2000 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aJudicial review and the constitution /$fedited by Christopher Forsyth 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aOxford $aPortland, Oregon $cHart Publishing $d2000. 215 $a1 online resource (xxxvii, 442 pages) 311 0 $a1-84113-105-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references 327 $aPART I THE DEBATE BEGINS -- 1. Is the Ultra Vires Rule the Basis of Judicial Review? -- Professor Dawn Oliver -- 2. Of Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: The Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicial Review -- Christopher Forsyth -- 3. Ultra Vires and the Foundations of Judicial Review -- Professor Paul Craig -- 4. Illegality: The Problem of Jurisdiction -- Lord Justice Laws -- 5. The Ultra Vires Doctrine in a Constitutional Setting: Still the Central Principle of Administrative Law -- Mark Elliott -- PART II THE JURISPRUDENTIAL DEBATE -- 6. Ultra Vires and Institutional Interdependence -- Nicholas Bamforth -- 7. Form and Substance in the Rule of Law: A Democratic Justification for Judicial Review -- Professor David Dyzenhaus -- 8. Judicial Review and the Meaning of Law -- Lord Justice Laws -- PART III CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW -- 9. The Foundations of Review, Devolved Power and Delegated Power -- Professor Brigid Hadfield -- 10. The Courts, Devolution and Judicial Review -- Professor Paul Craig -- 11. Convention Rights and Substantive Ultra Vires -- Professor David Feldman -- 12. Fundamental Rights as Interpretative Constructs: The Constitutional -- Mark Elliott 330 8 $aThis collection of essays presents opposing sides of the debate over the foundations of judicial review. In this work,however, the discussion of whether the 'ultra vires' doctrine is best characterised as a central principle of administrative law or as a harmless, justificatory fiction is located in the highly topical and political context of constitutional change. The thorough jurisprudential analysis of the relative merits of models of 'legislative intention' and 'judicial creativity' provides a sound base for consideration of the constitutional problems arising out of legislative devolution and the Human Rights Act 1998. As the historical orthodoxy is challenged by growing institutional independence, leading figures in the field offer competing perspectives on the future of judicial review. "Confucius was wrong to say that it is a curse to live in interesting times. We are witnessing the development of a constitutional philosophy which recognises fundamental values and gives them effect in the mediation of law to the people". (Sir John Laws) Contributors Nick Bamforth, Paul Craig, David Dyzenhaus, Mark Elliott, David Feldman, Christopher Forsyth, Brigid Hadfield, Jeffrey Jowell QC, Sir John Laws, Dawn Oliver, Sir Stephen Sedley, Mark Walters. With short responses by: TRS Allan, Stephen Bailey, Robert Carnworth, Martin Loughlin, Michael Taggart, Sir William Wade 517 1 $aJudicial review & the constitution 606 $aJudicial review of administrative acts$zGreat Britain 606 $2Constitutional & administrative law 615 0$aJudicial review of administrative acts 676 $a347.41/012 702 $aForsyth$b C. F. 712 02$aUniversity of Cambridge.$bCentre for Public Law. 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 801 2$bUkLoBP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910784262303321 996 $aJudicial review and the constitution$93721363 997 $aUNINA