LEADER 03475oam  2200697I  450 
001 9910784083303321
005 20230617010249.0
010   $a1-134-41982-1
010   $a1-134-41983-X
010   $a1-280-02301-5
010   $a0-203-38080-0
024 7 $a10.4324/9780203380802
035   $a(CKB)1000000000254938
035   $a(EBL)182481
035   $a(OCoLC)299570223
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000301955
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11226398
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000301955
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10266516
035   $a(PQKB)11136447
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC182481
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL182481
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10097315
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL2301
035   $a(OCoLC)936888668
035   $a(OCoLC)252869827
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000254938
100   $a20180331d2003      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 14$aThe logic of liberal rights $ea study in the formal analysis of legal discourse /$fEric Heinze
210  1$aLondon ;$aNew York :$cRoutledge,$d2003.
215   $a1 online resource (353 p.)
225 1 $aRoutledge Studies in Twentieth Century Philosophy ;$vv.No.14
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-203-38930-1 
311   $a0-415-30056-8 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aBook Cover; Title; Contents; Acknowledgements; Cases and sources; Introduction; Agents; Rights and restrictions; Overview of agents; Parties; Quantification and reverse translation; The individual actor; The personal actor; The non-personal actor; Society; Theorems and proofs; Implication and implicature; Harm; Two harm axioms; Causation; The basic harm symbols; Causation markers; Right-based harm; Restriction-based harm; Consent; The concept of consent; Harm and consent; Volition; Forms of argument; Breach; The Urtheorie; Individualism and collectivism; The background theories
327   $aVolitional liberalismNon-consensual liberalism; Paternalism; Democracy; Conclusion: a roomful of scholars; Axioms and background theories; Symbols and formulas; Reverse translation rules; European Convention on Human Rights (excerpts); Answers to exercises; Glossary; Notes; Bibliography; Index
330   $aThe Logic of Liberal Rights uses basic logic to develop a model of argument presupposed in all disputes about civil rights and liberties. No prior training in logic is required, as each step is explained. This analysis does not merely apply general logic to legal arguments but is also specifically tailored to the issues of civil rights and liberties. It shows that all arguments about civil rights and liberties presuppose one fixed structure and that there can be no original argument in rights disputes, except within the confines of that structure. Concepts arising in disputes about ri
410  0$aRoutledge Studies in Twentieth Century Philosophy
606   $aLaw$xMethodology
606   $aNatural law
606   $aHuman rights
615  0$aLaw$xMethodology.
615  0$aNatural law.
615  0$aHuman rights.
676   $a340/.112
686   $a08.40$2bcl
700   $aHeinze$b Eric.$0281783
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910784083303321
996   $aThe logic of liberal rights$93865493
997   $aUNINA