LEADER 02466nam 2200577 a 450 001 9910784070003321 005 20230721025446.0 010 $a1-281-12167-3 010 $a9786611121679 010 $a981-277-055-0 035 $a(CKB)1000000000334131 035 $a(EBL)312343 035 $a(OCoLC)476099807 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000140274 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11149583 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000140274 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10030027 035 $a(PQKB)10291729 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC312343 035 $a(WSP)00006419 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL312343 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10188831 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL112167 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000334131 100 $a20070205d2007 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu---unuuu 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aDivided China$b[electronic resource] $epreparing for reunification, 883-947 /$fWang Gungwu 205 $a2nd ed. 210 $aNew Jersey $cWorld Scientific Pub.$dc2007 215 $a1 online resource (249 p.) 300 $aRev. ed. of: The structure of power in North China during the five dynasties. 1st ed. 1967. 311 $a981-270-792-1 311 $a981-270-611-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aThe military governors -- Fighting to centralize power -- New dynasty and failed restoration -- The control of the provinces -- North China and the Khitan invasion -- A new structure of power. 330 $aThe oneness of China is the norm. Periods of divisions are aberrations. This is how Chinese thinkers, leaders and ultimately the majority of Chinese people have regarded Chinese politics and history for more than 2,000 years. The oneness was never perfect. As long as certain minimal conditions were met and the polity which proclaimed that oneness was widely acknowledged, that was enough. Chinese ruling elites adopted this pragmatic approach so they could ensure that the ideal could always approximate China's reality. This is a revised edition of a study undertaken to explain what happened 607 $aChina$xPolitics and government$y907-979 676 $a951/.018 700 $aWang$b Gungwu$0638561 701 $aWang$b Gungwu$0638561 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910784070003321 996 $aDivided China$93842236 997 $aUNINA