LEADER 05485nam 2200673 a 450 001 9910783901103321 005 20230617005759.0 010 $a1-136-97671-X 010 $a1-280-30859-1 010 $a9786610308590 010 $a0-203-49513-6 035 $a(CKB)1000000000248379 035 $a(EBL)200852 035 $a(OCoLC)437061846 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000357641 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11263411 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000357641 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10359516 035 $a(PQKB)10714880 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC200852 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL200852 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10162518 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL761278 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000248379 100 $a20040316d2003 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aCauses and consequences of word structure$b[electronic resource] /$fby Jennifer Hay 210 $aNew York $cRoutledge$d2003 215 $a1 online resource (257 p.) 225 1 $aOutstanding dissertations in linguistics 300 $aOriginally presented as author's thesis (Ph. D.)--Northwestern University, 2000. 311 $a0-415-86140-3 311 $a0-415-96788-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 219-232) and index. 327 $aCover; Causes and Consequences of word Structure; Copyright; Contents; List of Figures; List of Tables; Preface; Acknowledgments; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Modeling Speech Perception; 1.2 Modeling Morphological Processing; 1.3 Lexical Effects; 1.3.1 Phonological Transparency; 1.3.2 Temporality; 1.3.3 Relative Frequency; 1.4 Prelexical Effects; 1.4.1 Metrical Structure; 1.4.2 Possible Word Constraint; 1.4.3 Probabilistic Phonotactics; 1.5 Consequences; 1.5.1 Words; 1.5.2 Affixes; 1.6 Some Disclaimers; 1.7 Organization of the Book; 2. Phonotactics and Morphology in Speech Perception 327 $a2.1 Phonotactics in Speech Perception2.2 Neural Networks and Segmentation; 2.3 Experiment 1: a Simple Recurrent Network; 2.3.1 Network Architecture; 2.3.2 Training Data; 2.3.3 Results and Discussion; 2.4 Phonotactics and Morphological Decomposition; 2.5 Experiment 2: Phonotactic Decomposition in Morphology; 2.5.1 Materials; 2.5.2 Methodology; 2.5.3 Results and Discussion; 2.6 Summary; 3. Phonotactics and the Lexicon; 3.1 Experiment 3: Phonotactics and Morphological Complexity; 3.1.1 Materials and Methodology; 3.1.2 Results and Discussion; 3.2 Calculating Juncturehood; 3.3 Prefixes 327 $a3.3.1 Prefixedness3.3.2 Semantics; Semantic Transparency Ratings: Wurm (1997); Polysemy; Degree of Semantic Drift; 3.3.3 Lexical Frequency; 3.4 Suffixes; 3.4.1 Semantics; Degree of Semantic Drift; Polysemy; 3.4.2 Lexical Frequency; 3.4.3 Summary: Suffixes and Junctural Phonotactics; 3.5 Summary; 4. Relative Frequency and Morphological Decomposition; 4.1 Relative Frequency in Morphology; 4.2 Surface Frequency and Decomposition; 4.3 Base Frequency and Decomposition; 4.4 Models of Morphological Processing; 4.4.1 Bybee's ""morphology as Connections"" Model 327 $a4.4.2 Caramazza's ""augmented Addressed Morphology""4.4.3 Marslen-wilson's ""direct Access Model""; 4.4.4 Baayen(1992); 4.4.5 Frauenfelder and Schreuder (1992); 4.4.6 Schreuder and Baayen's Morphological Meta-model; 4.4.7 Summary; 4.5 Experiment 4: Relative Frequency and Morphological Complexity; 4.5.1 Materials and Methodology; 4.5.2 Results and Discussion; 4.6 Experiment 5: Relative Frequency and Pitch Accent Placement; 4.6.1 Materials and Methodology; 4.6.2 Results; 4.6.3 Discussion; 4.7 Summary; 5. Relative Frequency and the Lexicon; 5.1 Relative Frequency Distributions in Affixed Words 327 $a5.2 Relative Frequency in Prefixed Forms5.2.1 Relative Frequency and Polysemy in Prefixed Forms; 5.2.2 Relative Frequency and Semantic Drift of Prefixed Forms; 5.3 Relative Frequency in Suffixed Forms; 5.3.1 Relative Frequency and Semantic Drift in Suffixed Forms; 5.3.2 Relative Frequency and Polysemy in Suffixed Forms; 5.4 Summary; 5.5 Consequences; 6. Relative Frequency and Phonetic Implementation; 6.1 Experiment 6: Relative Frequency and /tadeletion; 6.1.1 Materials; 6.1.2 Measurement and Analysis; 6.1.3 Results and Discussion; 6.2 Discussion; 7. Morphological Productivity 327 $a7.1 Measuring Productivity 330 $aThis book explores the effect of speech perception strategies upon morphological structure. Using connectionist modelling, perception and production experiments, and calculations over lexical, Jennifer Hay investigates the role of two factors known to be relevant to speech perceptions: phonotactics and lexical frequency.Hay demonstrates that low-probability phoneme transitions across morpheme boundaries exert a considerable force toward the maintenance of complex words, and argues that the relative frequency of the derived form and the base significantly affects the decomposability of comp 410 0$aOutstanding dissertations in linguistics. 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xMorphology 606 $aSpeech perception 615 0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xMorphology. 615 0$aSpeech perception. 676 $a415 700 $aHay$b Jennifer$0291443 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910783901103321 996 $aCauses and consequences of word structure$93828427 997 $aUNINA