LEADER 02984oam  2200625I  450 
001 9910783883103321
005 20230617003238.0
010   $a1-134-29970-2
010   $a1-134-29971-0
010   $a1-280-10630-1
010   $a0-203-32507-9
024 7 $a10.4324/9780203325070 
035   $a(CKB)1000000000250885
035   $a(EBL)199459
035   $a(OCoLC)437059314
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000178709
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11171400
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000178709
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10222023
035   $a(PQKB)10544453
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC199459
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL199459
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10094662
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL10630
035   $a(OCoLC)57587149
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000250885
100   $a20180706d2005      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aIneffability and philosophy /$fAndre Kukla
210  1$aLondon ;$aNew York :$cRoutledge,$d2005.
215   $a1 online resource (180 p.)
225 1 $aRoutledge studies in twentieth century philosophy ;$v22
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-415-59162-7 
311   $a0-415-33970-7 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [158]-162) and index.
327   $aCover; Ineffability and Philosophy; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; Preface; 1. Ineffability-the very idea; Indescribable entities; The Tarskian approach; Four or five grades of ineffability; Untranslatable languages; Inexpressible facts; Is the Tarskian criterion of ineffability vacuous?; 2. Mysticism, epistemic boundedness, and ineffability; The argument from epistemic boundedness; The argument from mysticism; 3. Believing the mystic; 4. Five types of ineffability; Unrepresentability; Unabducibility; Unselectability and unexecutability; Unreportability; References; Index
330   $aPresenting a fascinating analysis of the idea of what can't be said, this book ascertains whether the notion of there being a truth, or a state of affairs, or knowledge that can't be expressed linguistically is a coherent notion. The author distinguishes different senses in which it might be said that something can't be said.The first part looks at the question of whether ineffability is a coherent idea. Part two evaluates two families of arguments regarding whether ineffable states of affairs actually exist: the argument from mysticism and the argument from epistemic boundedness. Part thr
410  0$aRoutledge studies in twentieth century philosophy ;$v22.
606   $aIneffable, The
615  0$aIneffable, The.
676   $a121/.68
686   $a11.02$2bcl
700   $aKukla$b Andre$f1942-,$0952911
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910783883103321
996   $aIneffability and philosophy$93797187
997   $aUNINA