LEADER 03545nam 2200685 a 450 001 9910783757203321 005 20231206205526.0 010 $a1-282-85887-4 010 $a9786612858871 010 $a0-7735-6870-0 024 7 $a10.1515/9780773568709 035 $a(CKB)1000000000245006 035 $a(OCoLC)76898641 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10121235 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000283763 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11254188 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000283763 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10248975 035 $a(PQKB)10414981 035 $a(CaPaEBR)400162 035 $a(CaBNvSL)gtp00521441 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3330699 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10132882 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL285887 035 $a(OCoLC)929120869 035 $a(VaAlCD)20.500.12592/txz1rh 035 $a(schport)gibson_crkn/2009-12-01/1/400162 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3330699 035 $a(DE-B1597)656326 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780773568709 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3243774 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000245006 100 $a20000426d2001 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aRites of privacy and the privacy trade$b[electronic resource] $eon the limits of protection for the self /$fElizabeth Neill 210 $aMontreal ; Ithaca $cMcGill-Queen's University Press$d2001 215 $a1 online resource (208 p.) 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a0-7735-2113-5 311 $a0-7735-2097-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFront Matter -- $tContents -- $tDiagrams -- $tAcknowledgments -- $tIntroduction -- $tThe Ontological Structure of Natural Rights -- $tDistinguishing between Privacy and Autonomy -- $tDefending the Ontological Theory -- $tWhy Privacy? -- $tTransgressing Privacy: The Theory Applied to Trade -- $tConclusion -- $tNotes -- $tBibliography -- $tIndex 330 $aIn Rites of Privacy and the Privacy Trade Neill constructs an original theory of natural rights and human dignity to ground our right to privacy, arguing that privacy and autonomy are innate natural properties metaphorically represented on the moral level and socially bestowed. She develops her position by drawing on works in history, sociology, metaphor, law, and the moral psychology of Lawrence Kohlberg. The resulting theory provides surprising answers to controversial and pressing questions regarding, for instance, our right to privacy for medical records in various contexts and in relation to various authority structures, including government. Neill demonstrates that, while we have some entitlement to protection of privacy, entitlement does not have the moral scope suggested by currently entrenched legal and social norms. She cautions against some of the privacy privileges we currently enjoy - referring specifically to claims such as those against insurance companies to prevent access to medical records - and suggests that if they are to be continued, respect for privacy is not the reason. 606 $aPrivacy, Right of 606 $aDroit a? la vie prive?e 615 0$aPrivacy, Right of. 615 6$aDroit a? la vie prive?e. 676 $a323.44/8 700 $aNeill$b Elizabeth$f1962-$01506418 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910783757203321 996 $aRites of privacy and the privacy trade$93736640 997 $aUNINA