LEADER 02899oam 2200589 a 450 001 9910783503703321 005 20231206214221.0 010 $a1-282-85856-4 010 $a9786612858567 010 $a0-7735-6837-9 024 7 $a10.1515/9780773568372 035 $a(CKB)1000000000244838 035 $a(OCoLC)123470259 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10119857 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000277264 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11234302 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000277264 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10234041 035 $a(PQKB)10888599 035 $a(CaPaEBR)400065 035 $a(CaBNvSL)gtp00521348 035 $a(VaAlCD)20.500.12592/0d3rt9 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3330553 035 $a(DE-B1597)654647 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780773568372 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3243509 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000244838 100 $a19991007d2000 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aBetween literature and science$b[electronic resource] $ePoe, Lem, and explorations in aesthetics, cognitive science, and literary knowledge /$fPeter Swirski 210 $aMontreal, Que. $cMcGill-Queen's University Press$dc2000 215 $a1 online resource (203 p.) 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a0-7735-2043-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFront Matter --$tContents --$tIntroduction --$tThe Pragmatic Side of Aesthetics --$tTowards a New Epistemology --$tAn Essay in Cosmology --$tThere Is Science in My Philosophy --$tThe Future History of Biterature --$tOf Machines and Men --$tConclusion: No Discipline Is an Island --$tNotes --$tBibliography --$tIndex 330 $aThrough close analysis of Eureka and The Purloined Letter, Swirski evaluates Poe's epistemological theses in the light of contemporary philosophy of science and presents literary interpretation as a cooperative game played by the author and reader, thereby illuminating how we read fiction. The analysis of Poe's little-studied Eureka provides the basis for his discussion of Lem's critique of scientific reductionism and futurological forecasts. Drawing on his own interviews with Lem as well as analysis of his works, Swirski considers the author's scenarios involving computers capable of creative acts and discusses their socio-cultural implications. His analysis leads to bold arguments about the nature of literature and its relation to a broad range of other disciplines. 606 $aLiterature and science 615 0$aLiterature and science. 676 $a818/.309 700 $aSwirski$b Peter$f1963-$0874151 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910783503703321 996 $aBetween literature and science$93868486 997 $aUNINA