LEADER 04478nam 2201021 a 450 001 9910783389403321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-59734-813-9 010 $a1-282-35975-4 010 $a0-520-93742-2 010 $a9786612359750 024 7 $a10.1525/9780520937420 035 $a(CKB)1000000000024208 035 $a(EBL)222959 035 $a(OCoLC)56713994 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000223255 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11210333 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000223255 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10183013 035 $a(PQKB)10088692 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC222959 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse30438 035 $a(DE-B1597)519060 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780520937420 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL222959 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10068541 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL235975 035 $a(dli)HEB08132 035 $a(MiU)MIU01000000000000009642532 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000024208 100 $a20030715d2004 ub 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aPolicing cinema$b[electronic resource] $emovies and censorship in early-twentieth-century America /$fLee Grieveson 210 $aBerkeley $cUniversity of California Press$dc2004 215 $a1 online resource (363 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-520-23965-2 311 $a0-520-23966-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 317-329) and index. 327 $a1. Policing cinema -- 2. Scandalous cinema, 1906/1907 -- 3. Reforming cinema, 1907/1909 -- 4. Fighting films, 1909/1912 -- 4. Judging cinema, 1913/1914. 330 $aWhite slave films, dramas documenting sex scandals, filmed prize fights featuring the controversial African-American boxer Jack Johnson, D.W. Griffith's The Birth of a Nation-all became objects of public concern after 1906, when the proliferation of nickelodeons brought moving pictures to a broad mass public. Lee Grieveson draws on extensive original research to examine the controversies over these films and over cinema more generally. He situates these contestations in the context of regulatory concerns about populations and governance in an early-twentieth-century America grappling with the powerful forces of modernity, in particular, immigration, class formation and conflict, and changing gender roles.Tracing the discourses and practices of cultural and political elites and the responses of the nascent film industry, Grieveson reveals how these interactions had profound effects on the shaping of film content, form, and, more fundamentally, the proposed social function of cinema: how cinema should function in society, the uses to which it might be put, and thus what it could or would be. Policing Cinema develops new perspectives for the understanding of censorship and regulation and the complex relations between governance and culture. In this work, Grieveson offers a compelling analysis of the forces that shaped American cinema and its role in society. 606 $aMotion pictures$xCensorship$zUnited States$xHistory 610 $aafrican americans. 610 $aamerican cinema. 610 $aamerican culture. 610 $abirth of a nation. 610 $acensorship. 610 $acinema historians. 610 $aclass differences. 610 $acontroversial films. 610 $acultural history. 610 $aearly 20th century. 610 $afilm content. 610 $afilm culture. 610 $afilm industry. 610 $afilm regulations. 610 $afilm scholars. 610 $afilm studies. 610 $agender roles. 610 $agovernance and culture. 610 $aimmigration issues. 610 $anonfiction. 610 $apolicing art. 610 $apolitical elites. 610 $apower of cinema. 610 $aprize fights. 610 $aracism. 610 $arole of cinema. 610 $asex scandals. 610 $aslave films. 610 $asocial function. 610 $asocial history. 610 $asocial justice. 610 $atextbooks. 615 0$aMotion pictures$xCensorship$xHistory. 676 $a363.31/0973 700 $aGrieveson$b Lee$f1969-$0772678 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910783389403321 996 $aPolicing cinema$92346289 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04276nam 2200733 450 001 9910820253803321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-8047-9506-1 024 7 $a10.1515/9780804795067 035 $a(CKB)3710000000408818 035 $a(EBL)2037818 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001483952 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12612021 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001483952 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11429535 035 $a(PQKB)10754157 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0001103647 035 $a(DE-B1597)564848 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780804795067 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC2037818 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL2037818 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11051316 035 $a(OCoLC)923713955 035 $a(OCoLC)1178769868 035 $a(PPN)23534205X 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000408818 100 $a20140910h20152015 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aGulf security and the U.S. military $eregime survival and the politics of basing /$fGeoffrey F. Gresh 210 1$aStanford, California :$cStanford University Press,$d[2015] 210 4$dİ2015 215 $a1 online resource (281 p.) 225 1 $aStanford security studies 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-8047-9420-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aIntroduction : Gulf national security and the politics of basing -- Oil and war -- Negotiating a foothold -- Regime survival and the U.S. military -- A light footprint in Bahrain -- Sultan Qaboos and Operation Eagle Claw -- A Saudi sandstorm : revolution, rivalry, and terrorism -- Conclusion : the GCC today and lessons learned for the U.S. military. 330 $aThe U.S. military maintains a significant presence across the Arabian Peninsula but it must now confront a new and emerging dynamic as most Gulf Cooperation Council countries have begun to diversify their political, economic, and security partnerships with countries other than the United States?with many turning to ascending powers such as China, Russia, and India. For Gulf Arab monarchies, the choice of security partner is made more complicated by increased domestic and regional instability stemming in part from Iraq, Syria, and a menacing Iran: factors that threaten to alter totally the Middle East security dynamic. Understanding the dynamics of base politicization in a Gulf host nation?or any other?is therefore vitally important for the U.S. today. Gulf National Security and the U.S. Military examines both Gulf Arab national security and U.S. military basing relations with Gulf Arab monarchy hosts from the Second World War to the present day. Three in-depth country cases?Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Oman?help explain the important questions posed by the author regarding when and why a host nation either terminated a U.S. military basing presence or granted U.S. military basing access. The analysis of the cases offers a fresh perspective on how the United States has adapted to sometimes rapidly shifting Middle East security dynamics and factors that influence a host nation's preference for eviction or renegotiation, based on its perception of internal versus external threats. 410 0$aStanford security studies. 606 $aNational security$zPersian Gulf States 606 $aNational security$zArabian Peninsula 606 $aMilitary bases, American$zPersian Gulf States 606 $aMilitary bases, American$zArabian Peninsula 607 $aPersian Gulf States$xMilitary relations$zUnited States 607 $aUnited States$xMilitary relations$zPersian Gulf States 607 $aArabian Peninsula$xMilitary relations$zUnited States 607 $aUnited States$xMilitary relations$zArabian Peninsula 615 0$aNational security 615 0$aNational security 615 0$aMilitary bases, American 615 0$aMilitary bases, American 676 $a355/.0330536 700 $aGresh$b Geoffrey F.$f1979-$01715759 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910820253803321 996 $aGulf security and the U.S. military$94110669 997 $aUNINA