LEADER 02963nam  2200517Ia 450 
001 9910782823003321
005 20230721005333.0
010   $a1-383-04521-6
010   $a1-282-05334-5
010   $a9786612053344
010   $a0-19-156768-X
035   $a(CKB)1000000000724214
035   $a(EBL)430373
035   $a(OCoLC)319212744
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL430373
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10288367
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL205334
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC430373
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000724214
100   $a20081103d2009      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
200 00$aMetametaphysics$b[electronic resource] $enew essays on the foundations of ontology /$fedited by David Chalmers, David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman
210   $aOxford $cClarendon Press ;$aNew York $cOxford University Press$d2009
215   $a1 online resource (540 p.)
300   $aThis volume grew out of two conferences, one held at the Australian National University in June 2005, and another held at Boise State University in Mar. 2007.
311   $a0-19-954604-5 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aContents; List of Contributors; 1. Introduction: A Guided Tour of Metametaphysics; 2. Composition, Colocation, and Metaontology; 3. Ontological Anti-Realism; 4. Carnap and Ontological Pluralism; 5. The Question of Ontology; 6. The Metaontology of Abstraction; 7. Superficialism in Ontology; 8. Ontology and Alternative Languages; 9. Ambitious, Yet Modest, Metaphysics; 10. Ways of Being; 11. Metaphysics after Carnap: The Ghost Who Walks?; 12. On What Grounds What; 13. Ontological Realism; 14. Ontology, Analyticity, and Meaning: the Quine-Carnap Dispute; 15. Answerable and Unanswerable Questions
327   $a16. Being, Existence, and Ontological Commitment17. Must Existence-Questions have Answers?; Index
330   $aThis volume investigates the status and ambitions of metaphysics as a discipline. It brings together many of the central figures in the debate with their most recent work on the semantics, epistemology, and methodology of metaphysics. - ;Metaphysics asks questions about existence: for example, do numbers really exist? Metametaphysics asks. questions about metaphysics: for example, do its questions have determinate answers? If so, are these answers deep and important, or are they merely a matter of how we use words? What is the proper methodology for their resolution? These questions have recei
606   $aOntology$vCongresses
606   $aMetaphysics$vCongresses
615  0$aOntology
615  0$aMetaphysics
676   $a110.1
701   $aChalmers$b David John$f1966-$061384
701   $aManley$b David$0918882
701   $aWasserman$b Ryan$01512662
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910782823003321
996   $aMetametaphysics$93746708
997   $aUNINA