LEADER 03286nam  2200637Ia 450 
001 9910782718303321
005 20231206210353.0
010   $a1-282-85792-4
010   $a9786612857928
010   $a0-7735-6769-0
024 7 $a10.1515/9780773567696
035   $a(CKB)1000000000713555
035   $a(OCoLC)181843669
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10132409
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000280065
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11210800
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000280065
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10268170
035   $a(PQKB)10915437
035   $a(CaPaEBR)400692
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3330891
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10141561
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL285792
035   $a(OCoLC)929121097
035   $a(VaAlCD)20.500.12592/z3spnk
035   $a(schport)gibson_crkn/2009-12-01/1/400692
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3330891
035   $a(DE-B1597)655546
035   $a(DE-B1597)9780773567696
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3244703
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000713555
100   $a20000728d1999      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcn|||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aGrillparzer's Libussa $ethe tragedy of separation /$fWilliam C. Reeve
210  1$aMontreal :$cMcGill-Queen's University Press,$d1999.
215   $a1 online resource (303 pages)
300   $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
311 0 $a0-7735-1831-2 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [283]-288) and index.
327   $aAcknowledgments -- Introductions -- The inescapable paternal legacy: act one -- Cooperation/integration versus competition/separation: act two -- Likes repel: act three -- Jockeying for position and apparent reconciliation: act four -- The final separation(s): act five -- Conclusion -- Notes -- Works cited -- Index.
330   $aReeve not only offers a close textual analysis of the drama from the aspect of separation but shows how Libussa and its author fit into the development of the history of ideas in nineteenth-century Europe. He contends that Grillparzer's work reflects Bachofen, Neumann, Nietzsche, Freud, and Lacan. Using Freudian psychoanalysis, Neumann's investigation of the female archetype, and anthropological studies, Reeve argues that Grillparzer's tragedy portrays the struggle between matriarchy and patriarchy, nurturers and warriors, and rural and urban cultures. Since Libussa proves unable to overcome the gender bias of here male subjects, the play concludes with a symbolic statement of masculine superiority as man and woman remain intellectually and physically apart. Reeve's analysis draws parallels with Grillparzer's other two completed posthumous tragedies, Ein Bruderzwist in Habsburg and Die Jüdin von Toledo, relating his findings to the greater context of nineteenth-century German drama.
606   $aGerman literature$y19th century$xHistory and criticism
615  0$aGerman literature$xHistory and criticism.
676   $a832/.6
700   $aReeve$b William C.$f1943-$01468893
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910782718303321
996   $aGrillparzer's Libussa$93703371
997   $aUNINA