LEADER 03471nam  22007213u 450 
001 9910782530403321
005 20230422045540.0
010   $a1-282-16346-9
010   $a9786612163463
010   $a90-272-9926-9
035   $a(CKB)1000000000579073
035   $a(EBL)622369
035   $a(OCoLC)70765866
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000278226
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11255518
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000278226
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10246160
035   $a(PQKB)11414384
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC622369
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000579073
100   $a20130729d1999||||  u||            |
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aControl in Grammar and Pragmatics$b[electronic resource] $eA cross-linguistic study
210   $aAmsterdam/Philadelphia $cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company$d1999
215   $a1 online resource (218 p.)
225 1 $aLinguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a1-55619-911-2 
311   $a90-272-2748-9 
327   $aCONTROL IN GRAMMAR AND PRAGMATICS; Editorial page; Title page; LCC page; Preface; Contents; Chapter 1. Introduction; Chapter 2. Preliminaries; Chapter 3. The theory outlined; Chapter 4. The persuade subclass and cognate ones subject to the general constraint; Chapter 5. The case of promise; Chapter 6. No Choice of Controller; Chapter 7. Reflexive clitic impersonal clauses in Control structures; Chapter 8. "Self-control" with evaluating and attitudinal predicates; Chapter 9. Aspects of control in the "grain problem" and in VP-deletion
327   $aChapter 10. Summary and conclusions With some remaining questionsChapter 11. Turning to the Minimalist Program; Notes; References; Subject index; The Series LINGUISTIK AKTUELL/LINGUISTICS TODAY
330   $aThe claim that "...pronominals have phonological features only where they must, for some reason", is strongly supported by the occurrence of the null pronoun PRO as coined and introduced by Noam Chomsky. How reference of PRO is determined is the main subject of control theory, the subsystem of core grammar to which this study is dedicated. Chomsky has not followed up his "natural suggestion that choice of controller is determined by theta roles or other semantic properties of the verb, perhaps pragmatic conditions of some sort."But then, a great many students of control have engaged in exp
410  0$aLinguistik aktuell ;$vBd. 27.
606   $aControl (Linguistics)
606   $aGrammar, Comparative and general
606   $aPragmatics
606   $aControl (Linguistics)
606   $aGrammar, Comparative and general
606   $aPragmatics
606   $aPhilology & Linguistics$2HILCC
606   $aLanguages & Literatures$2HILCC
615  4$aControl (Linguistics).
615  4$aGrammar, Comparative and general.
615  4$aPragmatics.
615  0$aControl (Linguistics)
615  0$aGrammar, Comparative and general
615  0$aPragmatics
615  7$aPhilology & Linguistics
615  7$aLanguages & Literatures
676   $a411
700   $aRuz?icka$b Rudolf$0194010
702   $aRêuéziécka$b Rudolf
801  0$bAU-PeEL
801  1$bAU-PeEL
801  2$bAU-PeEL
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910782530403321
996   $aControl in Grammar and Pragmatics$93800336
997   $aUNINA