LEADER 02862nam 2200697 450 001 9910782348503321 005 20230421044216.0 010 $a0-19-772172-9 010 $a0-19-802732-X 010 $a9786610535088 010 $a1-280-53508-3 010 $a1-282-38423-6 010 $a9786612384233 010 $a0-19-535442-7 035 $a(CKB)1000000000549478 035 $a(StDuBDS)AH24083769 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000176178 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11165644 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000176178 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10206233 035 $a(PQKB)11500192 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4702576 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11273637 035 $a(OCoLC)816348158 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4702576 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000549478 100 $a20161012h19981998 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aIdeology in the language of judges $ehow judges practice law, politics, and courtroom control /$fSusan U. Philips 210 1$aNew York, [New York] ;$aOxford, [England] :$cOxford University Press,$d1998. 210 4$dİ1998 215 $a1 online resource (288p.) 225 1 $aOxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a0-19-511340-3 311 $a0-19-511341-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 330 $aStudying the language of judges in courtrooms, the author of this text demonstrates that they are not impartial arbiters of due process, but are influenced by their own politico-ideological stance and interpretation of the law. 330 $bPhilips looks at the languages of judges in the courtroom to show that, while judges see themselves as impartial agents of the constitutional right to due process, there is actually much diversity in the way that judges interract with defendants due to their interpretations of the law, their attitudes toward courtroom control, and their own political-ideological stances regarding due process. She uses courtroom transcripts, interviews, and the written law itself to show how ideological diversity is organized in legal discourse. 410 0$aOxford studies in anthropological linguistics. 606 $aJudges$zUnited States 606 $aJudicial process$zUnited States 606 $aLaw$xPolitical aspects 606 $aLaw$xLanguage 615 0$aJudges 615 0$aJudicial process 615 0$aLaw$xPolitical aspects. 615 0$aLaw$xLanguage. 676 $a347.73/14 700 $aPhilips$b Susan Urmston$0460672 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910782348503321 996 $aIdeology in the language of judges$93680156 997 $aUNINA