LEADER 05778nam 2200733 450 001 9910465060003321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a90-272-6984-X 035 $a(CKB)3710000000168313 035 $a(EBL)1730199 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001261458 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12486728 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001261458 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11320442 035 $a(PQKB)10372610 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1730199 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1730199 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10891865 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL625520 035 $a(OCoLC)883374031 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000168313 100 $a20140722h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aArgumentation and health /$fedited by Sara Rubinelli, University of Lucerne and Swiss Paraplegic Research ; A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, University of Amsterdam 210 1$aAmsterdam, Netherlands ;$aPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (153 p.) 225 1 $aBenjamins Current Topics ;$vVolume 64 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-4252-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and indexes. 327 $aArgumentation and Health; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Argumentation in the healthcare domain; Argumentation and informed consent in the doctor-patient relationship; Introduction; Reibl v. Hughes; The law and bioethics of informed consent; The asymmetry of the doctor-patient relationship; Preserving the balance of SDM in the informed consent interaction; The circularity of 'competent to consent'; References; Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering in shared medical decision-making; 1. Shared decision making 327 $a2. Comparison of the ideal of shared decision making with the concept of critical discussion3. Strategic maneuvering in the physician's presentation of treatments; 3.1 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that the patient seems to participate in the decision making process about the best treatment; 3.2 Presenting the available treatment options in such a way that the treatment preferred by the doctor seems to be the most reasonable option; 3.3 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that it looks as if the decision is completely up to the patient; 4. Conclusion; References 327 $aReasonableness of a doctor's argument by authority1. Introduction; 2. Argumentation in medical consultation; 3. Authority argumentation; 4. Soundness of a doctor's argument by authority; General soundness conditions; Specific soundness conditions; 5. Conclusion; References; Evaluating argumentative moves in medical consultations; 1. The social context of the medical consultation in Italy; 1.1 The Rigotti and Rocci model for the description of the communication context; 1.2 The institutionalized dimension of the medical consultation in Italy 327 $a2. Evaluating argumentation in medical consultationsExtract #1; Extract #2; Extract #3; 3. Concluding remarks; References; Teaching argumentation theory to doctors; 1. Introduction; 2. The 2012 medical consultation; 2.1 Patient-centeredness as a philosophy; 2.2 Shared decision-making as a model; 2.3 Informed consent as a process; 3. What does not work, what works, what is needed; 4. Conclusion; References; Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity type; 1. Introduction; 2. Intrinsic and extrinsic constraints on argumentative discourse 327 $a3. Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements4. DTCA as an argumentative activity type; 5. Example: Nexium advertisement; 6. Conclusion; References; The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochures; 1. Introduction; 2. A pragma-dialectical approach to pragmatic argumentation; 3. Dialectical options in the argumentation stage; 4. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address doubt towards the standpoint; 4.1 Dialectical relevance of choosing pragmatic argumentation; 4.2 Rhetorical advantage of choosing pragmatic argumentation 327 $a5. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address criticism 330 $aThis chapter is concerned with the reasons why sometimes good arguments in health communication leaflets fail to convince the targeted audience. As an illustrative example it uses the age-dependent eligibility of women in the Netherlands to receive routine breast cancer screening examinations: according to Dutch regulations women under 50 are ineligible for them. The present qualitative study rests on and complements three experimental studies on the persuasiveness of mammography information leaflets; it uses interviews to elucidate reasons why the arguments in the health communication leaflet 410 0$aBenjamins current topics ;$vVolume 64. 606 $aCommunication in medicine 606 $aMedical personnel 606 $aCommunication in human services 606 $aInterprofessional relations 606 $aDebates and debating 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aCommunication in medicine. 615 0$aMedical personnel. 615 0$aCommunication in human services. 615 0$aInterprofessional relations. 615 0$aDebates and debating. 676 $a610.1/4 702 $aRubinelli$b Sara 702 $aSnoeck Henkemans$b Arnolda Francisca 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910465060003321 996 $aArgumentation and health$92170410 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03831nam 2200937 a 450 001 9910782024603321 005 20230525074521.0 010 $a0-8147-9088-7 024 7 $a10.18574/nyu/9780814790885 035 $a(CKB)1000000000522876 035 $a(EBL)2081667 035 $a(OCoLC)913695269 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000281523 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11239890 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000281523 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10306485 035 $a(PQKB)10987616 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL2081667 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10176212 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3025597 035 $a(DE-B1597)548180 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780814790885 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC2081667 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3025597 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000522876 100 $a20060911d2007 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aLocal democracy under siege$b[electronic resource] $eactivism, public interests, and private politics /$fDorothy Holland ... [et al.] 210 $aNew York $cNew York University Press$dc2007 215 $a1 online resource (368 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-8147-3678-5 311 $a0-8147-3677-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 271-284) and index. 327 $aExperimenting with democracy -- Landscapes in transition -- Hope, fear, and political autobiography -- Racial framing -- Public goods for private ends : the redirection of schooling -- Local politics and the contemporary American scene -- Imagining local futures : who sets priorities for the present? -- Public business as usual -- Against American plutocracy : democratizing our communities, one by one -- Counter experiments for democracy : activism on new political terrain -- It's up to us : from local politics to a democratic America? 330 $a2007 Society for the Anthropology of North America (SANA) Book Award Complete List of Authors:Dorothy Holland, Donald M. Nonini, Catherine Lutz, Lesley Bartlett, Marla Frederick-McGlathery, Thaddeus C. Guldbrandsen, and Enrique G. Murillo, Jr. What is the state of democracy at the turn of the twenty-first century? To answer this question, seven scholars lived for a year in five North Carolina communities. They observed public meetings of all sorts, had informal and formal interviews with people, and listened as people conversed with each other at bus stops and barbershops, soccer games and 606 $aPolitical participation$zNorth Carolina 606 $aPolitical anthropology$zNorth Carolina 606 $aPolitical culture$zNorth Carolina 606 $aDemocracy$zNorth Carolina 607 $aNorth Carolina$xPolitics and government 610 $aThis. 610 $aactive. 610 $abook. 610 $achanges. 610 $adecades. 610 $ademocratic. 610 $adifficult. 610 $aeconomic. 610 $ahave. 610 $aillustrates. 610 $alast. 610 $amade. 610 $amaking. 610 $amore. 610 $aothers. 610 $aparticipation. 610 $apossible. 610 $aroutes. 610 $asocial. 610 $asome. 610 $athree. 610 $awhile. 615 0$aPolitical participation 615 0$aPolitical anthropology 615 0$aPolitical culture 615 0$aDemocracy 676 $a320.809756 700 $aHolland$b Dorothy, $4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01494160 701 $aHolland$b Dorothy C$01494160 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910782024603321 996 $aLocal democracy under siege$93806651 997 $aUNINA