LEADER 05416nam 2200685 450 001 9910787027403321 005 20230803205526.0 010 $a90-272-6988-2 035 $a(CKB)3710000000251973 035 $a(EBL)1810438 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001347321 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12483276 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001347321 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11350978 035 $a(PQKB)10317030 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1810438 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10950165 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL651863 035 $a(OCoLC)892731235 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1810438 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000251973 100 $a20141017h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 04$aThe diachrony of negation /$fedited by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen, Jacqueline Visconti 210 1$aAmsterdam, Netherlands ;$aPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (264 p.) 225 1 $aStudies in Language Companion ;$vVolume 160 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-322-20583-3 311 $a90-272-5925-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index. 327 $aThe Diachrony of Negation; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; The diachrony of negation; 1. A resilient subject; 1.1 A note on terminology; 2. Summaries of the individual chapters; References; On the relation between double clausal negation and negative concord; 1. Introduction; 2. Some obvious similarities and differences; 3. A typological relation?; 4. Negative concord as a prerequisite for Double Negation or Preverbal Negation; 5. Languages with both DN and NC; 5.1 Ewe and contamination; 5.2 Karok and negative absorption; 6. Languages with NC but no DN; 7. Conclusion; Abbreviations 327 $aReferences Appendix; The Jespersen cycles seen from Austronesian; 1. Introduction; 2. The Jespersen cycles; 3. Standard negation; 4. The Austronesian languages; 5. Negation in the Austronesian languages. An overview; 6. Where do we find double negation?; 7. Word order; 8. Negative etyma across languages; 9. Emphasis; 10. The origin of the new negation; 11. Triple and quadruple negation; 12. Conclusion; Abbreviations; References; The development of standard negation in Quechua; 1. Introduction; 2. Geographical and historical background; 3. Quechua interrogative-negative patterns 327 $a3.1 Types of interrogative-negative patterns 3.2 Standard negation in Quechua; 3.3 Overview of negation patterns for sentential negation in the Quechua language family; 4. Variations in the standard negation in the Quechua language family; 4.1 Peripheral Quechua varieties; 4.1.1 Standard negation: Single negation with mana; 4.1.2 Non-standard sentential negation in Peripheral Quechua varieties 327 $a4.1.2.1 Focus of negation. Here I mention some strategies to indicate the focus of negation. One is enclosing the negative phrase with [+focus] by mana...-chu. This pattern is used in most EK varieties, including Napo. Observe the wh-word question in (11) a 4.1.2.2 Emphatic negation. Here, the strategy is the addition of suffix -chu and/or subject displacement. Emphatic negation is evident in existential sentences in Napo Kichwa. Positive and negative existential sentences display the subject at initial 327 $a4.1.2.3 Emphatic negation in sentences expressing prohibition, warnings, advice and requests. As an additional proof of the emphatic role of the suffix -chu, there are negative sentences showing shades of compelling requests or orders within contexts requ4.1.2.4 Negation and evidentiality. The negative sentence in Peripheral Quechua can present interaction between the negative mana and the clitics -chu and -mi.; 4.1.2.5 Summary of strategies in Peripheral Quechua. Negation patterns in Peripheral Quechua are illustrated in Table 4 below: 327 $a4.2 Southern Quechua, some dialects of Central Quechua and Northern Peruvian Quechua 330 $aLabov's idea that the vernacular is the most stable variety of a language raises questions especially where languages of wider communication are concerned. Whether the vernacular practices of a language's geographical varieties are convergent synchronically and historically can be established by looking at particular variables. One such variable is investigated in this paper on the co-occurrence of a clausal negator with a n-word (e.g. I didn't do nothing, i.e. anything). The quantitative study of negative doubling in Quebec and France historical and contemporary vernacular sources demonstrate 410 0$aStudies in language companion series ;$vVolume 160. 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xNegatives 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xTense 606 $aNegation (Logic) 615 0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xNegatives. 615 0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xTense. 615 0$aNegation (Logic) 676 $a415/.7 702 $aMosegaard Hansen$b Maj-Britt 702 $aVisconti$b Jacqueline$f1966- 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910787027403321 996 $aThe diachrony of negation$93781940 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03148nam 22007212 450 001 9910781825003321 005 20151002020706.0 010 $a0-7486-5169-1 010 $a1-281-25193-3 010 $a9786611251932 010 $a0-7486-3201-8 024 7 $a10.1515/9780748632015 035 $a(CKB)1000000000485904 035 $a(EBL)334881 035 $a(OCoLC)476144735 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000113155 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11145493 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000113155 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10099777 035 $a(PQKB)10230664 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9780748632015 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000055545 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC334881 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL334881 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10221781 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL125193 035 $a(DE-B1597)614318 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780748632015 035 $a(OCoLC)1306538302 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000485904 100 $a20120514d2007|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe blind and blindness in literature of the Romantic period /$fEdward Larrissy$b[electronic resource] 210 1$aEdinburgh :$cEdinburgh University Press,$d2007. 215 $a1 online resource (229 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 02 Oct 2015). 311 $a0-7486-3281-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [205]-220) and index. 327 $aCOPYRIGHT; Contents; Preface; Acknowledgements; Chapter 1 The Enigma of the Blind; Chapter 2 The Celtic Bard in Ireland and Britain: Blindness and Second Sight; Chapter 3 Blake: Removing the Curse by Printing for the Blind; Chapter 4 Edifying Tales; Chapter 5 Wordsworth's Transitions; Chapter 6 Coleridge, Keats and a Full Perception; Chapter 7 Byron and Shelley: The Blindness of Reason; Chapter 8 Mary Shelley: Blind Fathers and the Magnetic Globe: Frankenstein with Valperga and The Last Man; Chapter 9 Conclusion; Bibliography; Index 330 $aIn the first full-length literary-historical study of its subject Edward Larrissy examines the philosophical and literary background to representations of blindness and the blind in the Romantic period. 517 3 $aThe Blind & Blindness in Literature of the Romantic Period 606 $aBlindness in literature 606 $aBlind in literature 606 $aRomanticism$zEngland 606 $aEnglish literature$y19th century$xHistory and criticism 606 $aEnglish poetry$y19th century$xHistory and criticism 615 0$aBlindness in literature. 615 0$aBlind in literature. 615 0$aRomanticism 615 0$aEnglish literature$xHistory and criticism. 615 0$aEnglish poetry$xHistory and criticism. 676 $a820.93527109034 700 $aLarrissy$b Edward$0528418 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910781825003321 996 $aThe blind and blindness in literature of the Romantic period$93815655 997 $aUNINA