LEADER 00794cam2-2200301---450 001 990006095150203316 005 20200421122020.0 035 $a000609515 035 $aUSA01000609515 035 $a(ALEPH)000609515USA01 035 $a000609515 100 $a20110420d1984----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $a||||||||001yy 200 1 $a1: 1869-1887$fStrindberg 210 $aMilano$cMursia$d1984 215 $aXLVII, 623 p.$d20 cm 300 $aIn custodia 461 0$1001000153732$12001$aTutto il teatro 700 1$aSTRINDBERG,$bAugust$0126055 801 0$aIT$bsalbc$gISBD 912 $a990006095150203316 951 $aXVII A. 753 1$b5313 DLAS$cXVII A.$d00347668 959 $aBK 969 $aCAS 996 $a1: 1869-1887$91387740 997 $aUNISA LEADER 05430nam 2200697 450 001 9910781785503321 005 20230508051222.0 010 $a1-4426-6168-2 010 $a1-4426-8675-8 024 7 $a10.3138/9781442686755 035 $a(CKB)2550000000043216 035 $a(OCoLC)755874170 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10488840 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000571155 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11351177 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000571155 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10611693 035 $a(PQKB)10229791 035 $a(CaBNVSL)slc00227093 035 $a(CEL)436869 035 $a(DE-B1597)479154 035 $a(OCoLC)987932127 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781442686755 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4672488 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11258155 035 $a(OCoLC)868069179 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4672488 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3276004 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)musev2_104306 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000043216 100 $a20160923h20112011 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||a|| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aPower of scandal $esemiotic and pragmatic in mass media /$fJohannes Ehrat 210 1$aToronto, [Ontario] ;$aBuffalo, [New York] ;$aLondon, [England] :$cUniversity of Toronto Press,$d2011. 210 4$dİ2011 215 $a1 online resource (424 p.) 225 1 $aToronto Studies in Semiotics and Communication 311 $a1-4426-4125-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tA theoretical approach to the nature of media scandal. How scandal research tends to treat the achievement of media scandals ;$tScandal as logic : ideal and sanction ;$tScandal as industrial product and institutional practice ;$tMedia scandals and what they are not ;$tVideo-truths ;$tComprehending media scandals from media ;$tPublicity narrative as precondition of scandals --$tWhat is publicity, the public sphere?. Publicity as methodological construct ;$tPublicity as simulacrum ;$tPublicity and meaning as subsistence ;$tSemiotic as theory of formal and concrete meaning --$tSemiotic of publicity. Publicity as teleology ;$tLegitimacy ;$tPublic opinion as historical-cultural role relation ;$tPublic opinion as theatre ;$tPublic opinion operates by constructing the role of enunciation instance --$tPublicity in media theory. Media : functional or semiotic? ;$tIs there a need for a separate semiotic media theory? ;$tSigns of society ;$tFunctions of the three correlates in the media sign ;$tTechnological determination or sign process : the case of televangelism ;$tGodcasting : meaning apparatuses of religious self-display --$tFrom Jubilation to scandal. Religious meaning outside of public opinion ;$tTelevision studies and aesthetic form ;$tMedia construction of religious space and time ;$tThe call forward ;$tWitnessing ;$tPrayTV yields to PreyTV : acts of televangelist authority ;$tPrimordial scandal religion --$tJudgement : bringing into scandal-position. Scandal technique ;$tInvestigative journalism and objectivity ;$tMetatexts : simplifying sanctions in public opinion texts ;$tDeduction classes of scandal --$tThe course of the scandal pro-gram. Media scandal methods ;$tEvent : how destination in the Shanley story created the scandal ;$tThe role structure of the Shanley story ;$tTwo discursive scandal constructions ;$tReality : news practice between reality determination and satirical alienation --$tEffect and reality of scandal. Scandal as objectivity effect ;$tObjective scandal effects ;$tCritique of subjectivity approaches and functionalism ;$tScandal effect as semiotic ;$tInstitutions as pragmatic predetermination of purpose ;$tDelegitimization of an institution as purpose of media scandals --$tConclusion. 330 $aEhrat applies classic semiotic and pragmatic thought to contemporary media issues, mainly moralist discourse from sex abuse cases to the phenomenon of televangelism. Arguing that sociological and communications studies of scandal have ignored the media's constructed nature, Ehrat focuses on how meaningful public narrative is produced. By examining the parallel worlds of media and public opinion, Power of Scandal uses an alternative heuristic for understanding mass communication that is both rigorous and sophisticated. 330 $a"Are there events that are inherently scandalous? Power of Scandal finds that the very idea of 'scandal' is derived not from an event, but from public opinion - which, in turn, is construed by media narratives. Scandal is powerful because of its ability to challenge institutions by destabilizing their legitimacy. The media plays an integral role in the creation of scandal because it interprets real events as purposeful actions for the public. Examining the ubiquity of scandals in today's mass media, Johannes Ehrat's conclusions are fresh and surprising 410 0$aToronto studies in semiotics and communication. 606 $aMass media$xSemiotics 606 $aScandals in mass media 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aMass media$xSemiotics. 615 0$aScandals in mass media. 676 $a302.2/4 700 $aEhrat$b Johannes$f1952-$0778090 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910781785503321 996 $aPower of scandal$93760354 997 $aUNINA