LEADER 03792nam  2200685Ia 450 
001 9910781238403321
005 20230524235020.0
010   $a1-283-17421-9
010   $a9786613174215
010   $a90-272-8327-3
035   $a(CKB)2550000000039115
035   $a(EBL)731650
035   $a(OCoLC)741492869
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000523767
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11913779
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000523767
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10560661
035   $a(PQKB)11133182
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC731650
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL731650
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10484074
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000000039115
100   $a19911219d1990      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aLanguage as behaviour, language as code $ea study of academic English /$fLynne Young
210  1$aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia :$cJ. Benjamins Pub.,$d1990.
215   $a1 online resource (313 pages) $cillustrations
225 1 $aPragmatics & beyond ;$vnew ser. 8
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311 0 $a90-272-5018-9 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $aLANGUAGE AS BEHAVIOUR, LANGUAGE AS CODE A STUDY OF ACADEMIC ENGLISH; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Acknowledgements; Table of contents; Chapter 1: The Social Functional Linguistic Tradition and Approach; Diagram 1: Communication linguistics model of language; Chapter 2: Analysis; PART ONE: SITUATING THE ANALYSIS; PART TWO: PHASAL ANALYSIS; Chapter 3: Results; PART ONE: REGISTERIAL CONSTRUCTS; PART TWO: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES AMONG THE SPOKEN DISCOURSES AND WRITTEN TEXTS; Chapter 4: Conclusion; PART ONE: A REAPPRAISAL OF THE MODEL OF ANALYSIS
327   $aPART TWO: PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS; Appendix 1: Transitivity System; Appendix 2: Mood System; Appendix 3: Chart of E.R. Ewer's Modals; Appendix 4: Charts of Phasal Characteristics: Discourses and Texts; Appendix 5: Transcripts of Discourses and Texts; Appendix 6: Discourse and Text Phases; Appendix 7: Sample Worksheet for Analysis; References
330   $aThis work arose from the desire to teach foreign students in North America a particular variety of language used in their disciplines (speech situations), whereupon the inadequacy or non-existence of previous study became apparent. Given this raison d'e?tre, the work first illustrates one approach to the analysis of language in order to test whether something of significance can be said about the typology of texts and discourse. The approach chosen is Systemic Functional Grammar, with its roots in the Prague School of Linguistics and the London School of J.R. Firth.
410  0$aPragmatics & beyond ;$vnew ser. 8.
517 3 $aLanguage as behavior, language as code
517 3 $aLanguage, behaviour and code
606   $aEnglish language$xStudy and teaching (Higher)$xForeign speakers$xSocial aspects
606   $aInterdisciplinary approach in education$xSocial aspects
606   $aEducation, Higher$xSocial aspects
606   $aEnglish language$xSocial aspects
606   $aPragmatics
615  0$aEnglish language$xStudy and teaching (Higher)$xForeign speakers$xSocial aspects.
615  0$aInterdisciplinary approach in education$xSocial aspects.
615  0$aEducation, Higher$xSocial aspects.
615  0$aEnglish language$xSocial aspects.
615  0$aPragmatics.
676   $a428.00711
700   $aYoung$b Lynne$0262197
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910781238403321
996   $aLanguage as behaviour, language as code$9972315
997   $aUNINA