LEADER 02506oam 2200613 a 450 001 9910791755803321 005 20231206233404.0 010 $a1-283-09240-9 010 $a9786613092403 010 $a90-272-8534-9 035 $a(CKB)2560000000071676 035 $a(OCoLC)713026640 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10594510 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000518649 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11351668 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000518649 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10494823 035 $a(PQKB)11133637 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC680392 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL680392 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10594510 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL309240 035 $a(OCoLC)713010232 035 $a(EXLCZ)992560000000071676 100 $a20050822h20052005 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aEpistemic modality $efunctional properties and the Italian system /$fPaola Pietrandrea 210 1$aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia :$cJohn Benjamins Pub.,$d2005. 210 4$dİ2005 215 $a1 online resource (xii, 232 pages) $cillustrations 225 0$aStudies in language companion series,$x0165-7763 ;$vv. 74 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 0 $a90-272-3084-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [217]-229) and index. 330 $aThis volume offers an original theoretical and methodological approach to the hotly debated issue of epistemic modality. The analysis is conducted in a rigorous typological frame developed after a careful consideration of a wealth of cross-linguistic data, and focuses on Italian, a language often disregarded in comparative analyses. The complexity of the Italian epistemic system provides relevant information that will undoubtedly foster a better understanding of the topic. A new definition of epistemic modality is proposed on a functional basis and the structure of the Italian epistemic system. 606 $aItalian language$xModality 606 $aItalian language$xSemantics 606 $aEpistemics 615 0$aItalian language$xModality. 615 0$aItalian language$xSemantics. 615 0$aEpistemics. 676 $a425/.6 700 $aPietrandrea$b Paola$0770001 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910791755803321 996 $aEpistemic modality$91570452 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03669nam 2200745Ia 450 001 9910780737903321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-282-71467-8 010 $a9786612714672 010 $a3-11-021463-6 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110214635 035 $a(CKB)2480000000000127 035 $a(EBL)511879 035 $a(OCoLC)613205864 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000412088 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11277823 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000412088 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10366117 035 $a(PQKB)10812121 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC511879 035 $a(DE-B1597)36041 035 $a(OCoLC)979626077 035 $a(OCoLC)987921877 035 $a(OCoLC)992489967 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110214635 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL511879 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10373547 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL271467 035 $z(PPN)175484228 035 $a(PPN)175227357 035 $a(EXLCZ)992480000000000127 100 $a20090901d2009 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aAristotle and Plotinus on memory$b[electronic resource] /$fby Richard A.H. King 210 $aBerlin ;$aNew York $cWalter de Gruyter$d2009 215 $a1 online resource (280 p.) 225 1 $aQuellen und Studien zur Philosophie,$x0344-8142 ;$vBd. 94 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a3-11-048155-3 311 $a3-11-021462-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $t Frontmatter -- $tContents -- $t1 Introduction -- $t2 Aristotle -- $t3 Plotinus -- $t4 General conclusion: Aristotle and Plotinus on memory -- $t Backmatter 330 $aTwo treatises on memory which have come down to us from antiquity are Aristotle's "On memory and recollection" and Plotinus' "On perception and memory" (IV 6); the latter also wrote at length about memory in his "Problems connected with the soul" (IV 3-4, esp. 3.25-4.6). In both authors memory is treated as a 'modest' faculty: both authors assume the existence of a persistent subject to whom memory belongs; and basic cognitive capacities are assumed on which memory depends. In particular, both theories use phantasia (representation) to explain memory.Aristotle takes representations to be changes in concrete living things which arise from actual perception. To be connected to the original perception the representation has to be taken as a (kind of) copy of the original experience - this is the way Aristotle defines memory at the end of his investigation.Plotinus does not define memory: he is concerned with the question of what remembers. This is of course the soul, which goes through different stages of incarnation and disincarnation. Since the disembodied soul can remember, so he does not have Aristotle's resources for explaining the continued presence of representations as changes in the concrete thing. Instead, he thinks that when acquiring a memory we acquire a capacity in respect of the object of the memory, namely to make it present at a later time. 410 0$aQuellen und Studien zur Philosophie ;$vBd. 94. 606 $aMemory (Philosophy) 610 $aMemory. 610 $aRecollection. 610 $aRepresentation. 610 $aSoul. 615 0$aMemory (Philosophy) 676 $a128.3 676 $a128/.3 686 $aCD 2067$2rvk 700 $aKing$b R. A. H$0108858 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910780737903321 996 $aAristotle and Plotinus on memory$93703648 997 $aUNINA