LEADER 03172nam  2200757   450 
001 9910780560803321
005 20231206204107.0
010   $a1-282-01451-X
010   $a9786612014512
010   $a1-4426-7758-9
024 7 $a10.3138/9781442677586
035   $a(CKB)2420000000004216
035   $a(EBL)4671752
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000304037
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11246909
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000304037
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10277058
035   $a(PQKB)10512648
035   $a(CaBNvSL)thg00600266 
035   $a(DE-B1597)464682
035   $a(OCoLC)944177931
035   $a(OCoLC)999374151
035   $a(DE-B1597)9781442677586
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4671752
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11257451
035   $a(OCoLC)958513924
035   $a(VaAlCD)20.500.12592/89qx6t
035   $a(schport)gibson_crkn/2009-12-01/6/418397
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4671752
035   $a(OCoLC)288095035
035   $a(MdBmJHUP)musev2_105010
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3254771
035   $a(EXLCZ)992420000000004216
100   $a20160922h20012001  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aNatural law modernized /$fDavid Braybrooke
205   $a2nd ed.
210  1$aToronto, [Ontario] ;$aBuffalo, [New York] ;$aLondon, [England] :$cUniversity of Toronto Press,$d2001.
210  4$dİ2001
215   $a1 online resource (366 p.)
225 0 $aToronto Studies in Philosophy
300   $aIncludes index.
311   $a0-8020-8644-6 
311   $a0-8020-3543-4 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tPreface -- $t1. Did Medieval Natural Law Die Out? -- $t2. Locke's Natural Law and St Thomas's: Secular in Content, Empirical in Foundation -- $t3. Rousseau and St Thomas on the Common Good -- $t4. Hobbes Allied with St Thomas: An Axiomatic System of Laws -- $t5. David Hume: Natural Law Theorist and Moral Realist -- $t6. From Private Property in Hume and Locke to the Universality of Natural Laws -- $t7. With Us Still: Natural Law Theory Illustrated Today in the Work of David Copp -- $t8. Moral Education -- $t9. Epilogue: The Lasting Strength of Natural Law Theory in Jurisprudence -- $tAppendix: Natural Law in Philosophical Traditions outside the Christian West -- $tNotes -- $tIndex
330   $a"Braybrooke challenges received scholarly opinion by arguing that canonical theorists Hobbes, Locke, Hume, and Rousseau took St Thomas Aquinas as their point of reference, reinforcing rather than departing from his natural law theory."--JSTOR website (viewed March 8, 2017).
410  0$aToronto studies in philosophy
606   $aNatural law
606   $aNatural law$xHistory
608   $aElectronic books. 
615  0$aNatural law.
615  0$aNatural law$xHistory.
676   $a340.112
700   $aBraybrooke$b David$0211672
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910780560803321
996   $aNatural law modernized$93787577
997   $aUNINA