LEADER 03124nam 2200589 a 450 001 9910780023603321 005 20230421041423.0 010 $a0-8147-8441-0 010 $a0-585-42498-5 024 7 $a10.18574/9780814784419 035 $a(CKB)111056486728316 035 $a(EBL)865937 035 $a(OCoLC)782878067 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000141048 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11150419 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000141048 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10054973 035 $a(PQKB)10074889 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC865937 035 $a(OCoLC)50760659 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse10373 035 $a(DE-B1597)546834 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780814784419 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL865937 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10032539 035 $a(OCoLC)1163878181 035 $a(EXLCZ)99111056486728316 100 $a19980603d1998 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aDouble jeopardy$b[electronic resource] $ethe history, the law /$fGeorge C. Thomas III 210 $aNew York $cNew York University Press$dc1998 215 $a1 online resource (363 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-8147-8233-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 331-340) and index. 327 $tThe road back to Blackstone : an overview of the argument --$tDouble jeopardy policy and history --$tStandard double jeopardy approaches --$t"Life or limb" blameworthiness --$tSingular/distinct blameworthiness --$tBringing coherence to same-offense doctrine --$tUnifying same-offense theory : a blameworthiness test of collateral estoppel --$tSecond jeopardies : a fresh look at Blackstone's solution --$tThe role of legislative intent in determining the end of jeopardy --$tA final defense : a bill of particulars and an answer. 330 $aIn the first book-length book on the subject in over a quarter century, George C. Thomas III advances an integrated theory of double jeopardy law, a theory anchored in historical, doctrinal, and philosophical method. Despite popular belief, double jeopardy has never been a limitation on the legislature. It functions instead to keep prosecutors and judges from imposing more than one criminal judgment for the same offense. Determining when seemingly different offenses constitute the "same offense" is no easy task. Nor is it always easy to determine when a defendant has suffered more than one criminal judgment. Tracing American double jeopardy doctrine back to twelfth century English law, the book develops a jurisprudential account of double jeopardy that recognizes the central role of the legislature in creating criminal law blameworthiness. 606 $aDouble jeopardy$zUnited States$xHistory 615 0$aDouble jeopardy$xHistory. 676 $a345.73/04 700 $aThomas$b George C$g(George Conner),$f1947-$01505657 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910780023603321 996 $aDouble jeopardy$93790770 997 $aUNINA