LEADER 05526nam 2200637 a 450 001 9910779868103321 005 20230803021100.0 010 $a3-11-030497-X 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110304978 035 $a(CKB)2550000001097189 035 $a(EBL)1121612 035 $a(OCoLC)851970547 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000972357 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12459138 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000972357 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10949082 035 $a(PQKB)10676892 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1121612 035 $a(DE-B1597)206818 035 $a(OCoLC)853265632 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110304978 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1121612 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10728870 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL503723 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001097189 100 $a20130717d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aReinventing structuralism$b[electronic resource] $ewhat sign relations reveal about consciousness /$fRodney B. Sangster 210 $aBerlin $cDe Gruyter$d2013 215 $a1 online resource (230 p.) 225 1 $aTrends in linguistics studies and monographs,$x1861-4302 ;$vv. 264 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a3-11-030373-6 311 $a1-299-72472-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographic references and index. 327 $t Frontmatter -- $tPreface -- $tContents -- $tIntroduction: The promise of modern-day structuralism -- $t1. Seeking the correlates of meaning in language -- $t2. Sign relations as organic properties of mind -- $t3. Language as a self-organizing system -- $t4. Applying the sign principle to grammatical meaning -- $t5. Case relations as a product of grammatical selection -- $t6. Extending the sign principle to syntax -- $t7. The potential of sign theory in the domain of lexical meaning -- $t8. The feature hierarchy that defines human conceptual space -- $t9. Neurological evidence for the evolution of higher-order consciousness -- $t10. The position of structuralism in the modern era -- $tEpilogue: The wisdom of the primal mind -- $tBibliography -- $tGlossary -- $tIndex 330 $aThis monograph argues that the structuralist movement in linguistics was curtailed prematurely, before its contribution to cognitive science could be fully realized. Building upon Roman Jakobson's pioneering work on the nature of the linguistic sign, a new and detailed appreciation of the role of sign relations in the ultimate structuring of consciousness is presented, proving that the structural approach has as much to contribute today as any current cognitive theory. This study takes the view that the structure which linguistic signs themselves evince should be treated as an organic property of mind in its own right, as the device by which the ultimate differences in meaning in the human cognitive sphere are realized. Adherence to this principle assumes not only that the linguistic sign must be fundamentally monosemic, but also that the level of abstraction at which the relations between signs function must lie beyond the logical or rational level where polysemy is the rule. The study demonstrates that while the conceptual relations or categories uncovered at such a higher-order level of consciousness are of necessity highly abstract and hidden from normal awareness, they are nevertheless neither ineffable nor devoid of content. Rather, the categories identified and defined in this study are shown to have verifiable correlates at the supra-rational level where transpersonal rather than ego-oriented psychology operates, the level that Jung termed the collective unconscious. It is here that we find corresponding properties in reports from altered states of consciousness, in the structure of myths worldwide, as well as in studies of the image-making capacity of the human mind. Ultimately, when the structure of actual linguistic signs is treated as an ordered set of conceptual relations, one necessarily arrives at the conclusion that the sign relations of different languages are anything but Whorfian, but are all pointing to the same universal set of conceptual properties. This set of properties is then shown to be able to account for the relations between signs in all areas of linguistic structure, from the grammatical to the lexical and the syntactic. The monograph goes on to provide a detailed account of the process of making reference, of how speakers are able to contextualize the truly abstract conceptual relations inherent in the structure of signs in their language, to produce a potentially infinite variety of polysemous meanings in actual speech situations at whatever level of concreteness they choose; and how the feedback from such acts of communication determines the evolutionary trajectory of a system of signs conceived as a living organism, specifically as a neuronal structure inherent in the human brain operating as a fundamentally probabilistic or stochastic system. 410 0$aTrends in linguistics.$pStudies and monographs ;$v264. 606 $aStructuralism 610 $aCognitive Science. 610 $aSign Theory. 610 $aStructuralism. 615 0$aStructuralism. 676 $a410.18 700 $aSangster$b Rodney B$01542497 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910779868103321 996 $aReinventing structuralism$93795288 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02747nam 2200553 450 001 9910809692703321 005 20230808195432.0 010 $a90-04-33055-0 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004330559 035 $a(CKB)3710000000865091 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4790402 035 $a 2016045154 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004330559 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000865091 100 $a20160929d2016 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aIs the Turk a white man? $erace and modernity in the making of Turkish identity /$fby Murat Ergin 210 1$aLeiden ;$aBoston :$cBrill,$d2016. 215 $a1 online resource (286 pages) $ccolor illustrations 225 0 $aStudies in critical social sciences ;$vv. 95 311 $a90-04-32433-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aPreliminary Material -- Introduction -- Why This Book Should Not Have Been Written -- The Republican Conversion Narrative -- Encounters with the ?West? -- Race in Early Republican Turkey -- Close Encounters and Racial Discourses -- Race in Contemporary Turkey -- Conclusion -- Bibliography -- Index. 330 $aIn 1909, the US Circuit Court in Cincinnati set out to decide ?whether a Turkish citizen shall be naturalized as a white person?; the New York Times article on the decision, discussing the question of Turks? whiteness, was cheekily entitled ?Is the Turk a White Man?? Within a few decades, having understood the importance of this question for their modernization efforts, Turkish elites had already started a fantastic scientific mobilization to position the Turks in world history as the generators of Western civilization, the creators of human language, and the forgotten source of white racial stock. In this book, Murat Ergin examines how race figures into Turkish modernization in a process of interaction between global racial discourses and local responses. 410 0$aStudies in Critical Social Sciences$v95. 606 $aEthnicity$zTurkey 606 $aEthnology$zTurkey 606 $aGroup identity$zTurkey 606 $aTurks$xEthnic identity 606 $aTurks$xRace identity 607 $aTurkey$xEthnic relations 607 $aTurkey$xRace relations 615 0$aEthnicity 615 0$aEthnology 615 0$aGroup identity 615 0$aTurks$xEthnic identity. 615 0$aTurks$xRace identity. 676 $a305.894/35 700 $aErgin$b Murat$f1977-$01602215 801 0$bNL-LeKB 801 1$bNL-LeKB 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910809692703321 996 $aIs the Turk a white man$93926112 997 $aUNINA