LEADER 04814nam 22006612 450 001 9910779441703321 005 20151005020623.0 010 $a1-139-61061-9 010 $a1-107-23588-X 010 $a1-139-61247-6 010 $a1-139-60894-0 010 $a1-139-13553-8 010 $a1-139-61619-6 010 $a1-139-62549-7 010 $a1-283-89936-1 010 $a1-139-62177-7 035 $a(CKB)2550000000710931 035 $a(EBL)1099891 035 $a(OCoLC)823724267 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000783103 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11418694 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000783103 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10764608 035 $a(PQKB)10202706 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9781139135535 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1099891 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1099891 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10635760 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL421186 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000710931 100 $a20110804d2013|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aDomestic judicial review of trade remedies $eexperiences of the most active WTO members /$fedited by Mu?slum Yilmaz$b[electronic resource] 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2013. 215 $a1 online resource (xv, 445 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 225 1 $aCambridge international trade and economic law ;$v10 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 $a1-107-02223-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tCanada : high deference, stark reality /$rAndrew M. Lanouette, Christopher J. Kent --$tUnited States : judicial review : a cornerstone of trade remedies practice /$rJohn D. McInerney, Michele D. Lynch --$tMexico : quasi-judicial review of trade remedy measures by NAFTA panels /$rJorge Miranda, Juan Carlos Partida --$tColombia : a complex court system with the possibility of three instances /$rMari?a Clara Lozano --$tBrazil : the need for enhanced effectiveness /$rRabih A. Nasser, Luciana B. Costa --$tArgentina : a well-structured but unsuccessful judicial review system /$rMercedes De Artaza --$tPeru : a sophisticated but underused judicial review system /$rLuis Alberto Leo?n, Mari?a Antonieta Merino --$tThe European Union : an imperfect and time-consuming system /$rEdwin Vermulst, Juhi Sud --$tTurkey : a judicial review system in need of change /$rMu?slu?m Yilmaz --$tIsrael : a comparative study of two models /$rArie Reich, Gill Nadel --$tSouth Africa : a complicated, unpredictable, long and costly judicial review system /$rGustav Brink --$tPakistan : an evolving judicial review system /$rFaizullah Khilji, Mazhar Bangash --$tIndia : a three-tier judicial review system /$rMadhurendra Nath Jha --$tChina : an untested theoretical possibility? /$rHenry Gao --$tKorea : increasing attention and new challenges /$rJaemin Lee --$tIndonesia : a judicial review system in dire need of restructuring /$rErry Bundjamin --$tAustralia : judicial review with merits review /$rStephen Gageler --$tCountries with insufficient judicial review activity.$tJapan : a system yet to be tested /$rOsamu Umejima ;$tMalaysia : strictly off the record /$rEdmund Sim ;$tNew Zealand : managing to avoid judicial review /$rHugh McPhail ;$tThailand : a long road ahead /$rApisith John Sutham, Pattanan Kalawantavanich, Sakkapol Vachatimanont. 330 $aTrade remedies, namely anti-dumping, countervailing measures and safeguards, are one of the most controversial issues in today's global trading environment. When used, such measures effectively close the markets of the importing countries to competition from outside for a certain period of time. Exporters that are faced with such measures can either try to convince their government to bring a case against the government of the importing country in the WTO or to use, themselves, the judicial review mechanism of the importing country. This second path has been, until now, largely unexamined. Domestic Judicial Review of Trade Remedies is the first book of its kind to examine in detail how the judicial review process has functioned and considers the experiences in the domestic courts of the twenty-one WTO members that are the biggest users of trade remedies. 410 0$aCambridge international trade and economic law ;$v10. 606 $aForeign trade regulation 606 $aJudicial review 615 0$aForeign trade regulation. 615 0$aJudicial review. 676 $a343.08/7 702 $aY?lmaz$b Mu?slu?m 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910779441703321 996 $aDomestic judicial review of trade remedies$93817285 997 $aUNINA