LEADER 03575nam 2200685Ia 450 001 9910779297703321 005 20230802005236.0 010 $a1-283-71664-X 010 $a0-7748-2308-9 024 7 $a10.59962/9780774823081 035 $a(CKB)2550000000104051 035 $a(OCoLC)777304449 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10573488 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000717172 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11400396 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000717172 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10740575 035 $a(PQKB)11169443 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3412801 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3412801 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10569015 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL402914 035 $a(OCoLC)923449209 035 $a(DE-B1597)661127 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780774823081 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000104051 100 $a20111102d2012 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aInternational trade law and domestic policy$b[electronic resource] $eCanada, the United States, and the WTO /$fJacqueline D. Krikorian 210 $aVancouver $cUBC Press$d2012 215 $a1 online resource (321 p.) 225 1 $aLaw and society series 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a0-7748-2307-0 311 $a0-7748-2306-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aJudicial review and the WTO -- Courts and public policy making -- The legalization of the GATT trading regime -- The establishment of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism -- Washington, Ottawa, and the WTO Agreement -- The United States and the WTO -- The United States, trade remedies, and the WTO -- Canada and the WTO -- The impact of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism on domestic law and policy. 330 $aCritics of the World Trade Organization argue that its binding dispute settlement process imposes a neoliberal agenda on member states. If this is the case, why would any nation agree to participate? Jacqueline Krikorian explores this question by examining the impact of the WTO's dispute settlement mechanism on domestic policies in the United States and Canada. She demonstrates that the WTO's ability to influence domestic arrangements has been constrained by three factors: judicial deference, institutional arrangements, and strategic decision making by political elites in Ottawa and Washington. By bringing the insights of law and politics scholarship to bear on a subject matter traditionally addressed by international relations scholars, Krikorian shows that the classic division in political science between these two fields of study, though suitable in the postwar era, is outdated in the context of a globalized world. 410 0$aLaw and society series. 606 $aForeign trade regulation$xPolitical aspects$zCanada 606 $aForeign trade regulation$xPolitical aspects$zUnited States 607 $aCanada$xPolitics and government 607 $aUnited States$xPolitics and government 607 $aCanada$xPolitique et gouvernement 607 $aE?tats-Unis$xPolitique et gouvernement 615 0$aForeign trade regulation$xPolitical aspects 615 0$aForeign trade regulation$xPolitical aspects 676 $a343.7108/7 700 $aKrikorian$b Jacqueline D$01534908 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910779297703321 996 $aInternational trade law and domestic policy$93782769 997 $aUNINA