LEADER 03217nam 2200565 a 450 001 9910778966503321 005 20230613225957.0 010 $a0-8330-4356-0 010 $a0-585-38407-X 035 $a(CKB)111004368714984 035 $a(OCoLC)70752579 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary2004572 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000119899 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11988800 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000119899 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10073930 035 $a(PQKB)10915478 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3031478 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr2004572 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3031478 035 $a(EXLCZ)99111004368714984 100 $a19991007h20002000 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe changing quality of stability in Europe $ethe Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty toward 2001 /$fJohn E. Peters ; National Defense Research Institute 210 1$aSanta Monica, CA :$cRAND,$d2000. 210 4$aŠ2000 215 $a1 online resource (xiii, 34 pages) $cillustrations 300 $a"Prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense." 311 0 $a0-8330-2783-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aIntroduction What CFE Can and Cannot Do NATO and the CFE Treaty The Future Conventional Arms Control Agenda The Next Implementation Review Conference 330 $aSome observers have wondered whether the Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty was becoming an instrument whose purpose had become obsolete, or whose function had been taken over by other, more effective institutions. The author concludes that it no longer functions as its designers originally intended, but it nevertheless continues to contribute to the region's stability. This report illustrates that CFE cannot merely exist in stasis but must interact with other arms control activities and other European security instruments. Along the line of other security instruments, the author proposes safety and security measures to improve peoples' confidence that civil authority will function fairly to protect them--measures providing international monitors to evaluate the objectivity and legal basis of the police process, and providing people with recourse to an international court in the event due process is not observed. The protracted need for NATO forces in Bosnia is testimony to the fact that the arms control aspects of the Dayton Accords, although successful at separating the belligerents and corralling the major weapons, do not go far enough in addressing the fundamental problems of Bosnia and many parts of Europe in general. 606 $aArms control$zEurope 607 $aUnited States$xMilitary relations$zEurope 607 $aEurope$xMilitary relations$zUnited States 615 0$aArms control 676 $a341.7/33/094 700 $aPeters$b John E.$f1947-$0952041 712 02$aNational Defense Research Institute (U.S.) 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910778966503321 996 $aThe changing quality of stability in Europe$93709706 997 $aUNINA