LEADER 01249nam0-22003371i-450- 001 990001310110403321 005 20110207172437.0 035 $a000131011 035 $aFED01000131011 035 $a(Aleph)000131011FED01 035 $a000131011 100 $a20001205d1905----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aeng 102 $aUS 105 $a--------001yy 200 1 $aLectures on mathematics$edelivered from september 2 to 5, 1903, before members of the American Mathematical Society in connection with the summer meeting held at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Mass.$fby Edward Burr Van Vleck, Henry Seely White, Frederick Shenstone Woods 210 $aNew York$cPublished for the American Mathematical Society by Macmillan$d1905 215 $aXII, 187 p.$d22 cm 225 1 $a<>Boston colloquium 700 1$aVleck,$bEdward Burr van$0492631 701 1$aWhite,$bHenry Seely$0492632 701 1$aWoods,$bFrederik Shenstone$f<1864- >$0432329 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990001310110403321 952 $a201-A-1$b0788$fMA1 952 $a201-A-2$b0789$fMA1 952 $a201-A-3$b7972$fMA1 959 $aMA1 996 $aLectures on mathematics$9383524 997 $aUNINA LEADER 05358nam 2200625 a 450 001 9910778958103321 005 20230718211905.0 010 $a1-283-42410-X 010 $a9786613424105 010 $a90-272-7441-X 035 $a(CKB)2550000000079171 035 $a(EBL)842936 035 $a(OCoLC)796384162 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001011147 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11659649 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001011147 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11004809 035 $a(PQKB)10594276 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC842936 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL842936 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10526816 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000079171 100 $a19880318d1988 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aLinguistics and formulas in Homer $escalarity and the description of the particle per /$fEgbert J. Bakker 210 1$aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia :$cJ. Benjamins Pub. Co.,$d1988. 215 $a1 online resource (318 pages) 311 0 $a1-55619-046-8 311 0 $a90-272-2057-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 281-291) and indexes. 327 $aLINGUISTICS AND FORMULAS IN HOMER; Title page; Copyright page; Table of Contents; PREFACE; 1. INTRODUCTION; 1.0 Aims of the investigation; 1.1 Per in Homer and after; 1.2 Facts from the data-base; 1.3 Per in Greek linguistics; 1.3.1 Emphasis; 1.3.2 Concession and strengthening; 133 Fraenkel: ""per heisst 'auch""'; 1.3.4 Etymology and diachrony; 1.4 Categories and prototypes; 1.5 Linguistics and formulas in Homer; NOTESTO CHAPTER 1.; 2. THE LINGUISTIC BACKGROUND: SCALARITY; 2.0 Introduction; 2.1 Scales; 2.1.1 Scalarity: introductory; 2.1.2 Superlatives: scalar and attributive 327 $a2.1.3 The non-referentiality of scalar superlatives; 2.1.4 Irrealis modality; 2.2 Scalarity and referentiality; 2.2.1 Attributive and referential superlatives; 2.2.2 Intension and extension; 2.2.3 Scalarity and extensional terms; 2.3. Focus particles and focus contexts; 2.3.1 Even as a focus particle; 2.3.1.1 Conventional implicature and the meaning of even; 2.3.1.2 Elocution and the use of even; 2.3.1.3 Focus and scope; 2.3.1.4 Scope dependence and scope independence; 2.3.1.5 Scope ambiguity; 2.3.1.6 Even if: concession and concessive conditionals; 2.3.2 Types of focus context 327 $a2.4 Negative and positive polarity; 2.4.1 Positive polarity items; 2.4.2 Negative polarity items and scale reversal; NOTESTO CHAPTER 2.; 3. SCALARITY AND THE PARTICLE PER; 3.0 Introduction; 3.1 Intensional terms; 3.1.1 Scalar superlatives; 3.1.2 Scalar superlatives and the etymology of per; 3.1.3 Epic te and generic modality; 3.1.4 A remark on diachrony; 3.2 Extensional terms; 3.2.1 The intension of focus constituents; 3.2.2 Superlativeness, comparativeness and the illocution of even; 3.2.3 The concessive relative clause; 3.2.4 Scalar expressions and the Homeric narrator 327 $a3.3 Scalarity and comparatives; 3.4 Negative polar scalarity; 3.4.1 Declarative sentences; 3.4.2 Non-assertive contexts and negative polarity; 3.4.3 Scalar superlatives and negative polarity; 3.4.4 The strengthening of negation; 3.5 Scalarity in wishes and commands; 3.5.1 Imperative and optative sentences; 3.5.2 Inclusiveness and exclusiveness; 3.5.3 Scales of desirability and acceptability; 3.5.4 Per, ge and exclusion; 3.5.5 The diachronic aspect of per in wishes; 3.6 Some unclassifiable instances; NOTES TO CHAPTER 3.; 4. PARTICIPLES I: LINGUISTICS; 4.0 Introduction; 4.1 On participles 327 $a4.1.1 Kinds of adverbial relation; 4.1.2 Syntactic independence and modal autonomy; 4.2 From scalarity to concession; 4.2.1 The intension of circumstances; 4.2.2 Diachronic aspects of kai ho?s; 4.2.3 Syntactic intermezzo: correlation and apposition; 4.3 The concessive participial phrase; 4.3.1 The prototypical properties of 'participle + per'; 4.3.2 Loss of superlativeness; 4.3.3 Dependent participles; 4.3.4 Modally embedded participles; 4.4 From linguistics to the formula; 4.4.1 'Participle + per' and generic modality; 4.4.2 Kai, mala and strengthening; NOTES TO CHAPTER 4; 5. PARTICIPLES II: FORMULAS AND METRICS 330 $aThe purpose of this study is to provide a description of the Greek particle per as it occurs in the text of Homer. As such it is a contribution to the study of Ancient Greek in general and of the Greek' particles in particular. But the work transgresses the boundaries of Greek linguistics' proper. First, the discussion of per as a scalar article contributes to the discussion of scalar phenomena in general. Second, as a description of a linguistic feature in the Iliad and Odyssey, metrical texts of oral-formulaic origin, this study is also an essay in the relation between linguistics on the one 606 $aGreek language$xParticles 606 $aPer (The Greek word) 606 $aOral-formulaic analysis 615 0$aGreek language$xParticles. 615 0$aPer (The Greek word) 615 0$aOral-formulaic analysis. 676 $a883/.01 700 $aBakker$b Egbert J$0172351 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910778958103321 996 $aLinguistics and formulas in Homer$9487420 997 $aUNINA