LEADER 03890nam  22007332  450 
001 9910778872603321
005 20151005020621.0
010   $a1-107-11519-1
010   $a0-521-11867-0
010   $a1-280-16181-7
010   $a0-511-11697-7
010   $a0-511-14968-9
010   $a0-511-30297-5
010   $a0-511-48513-1
010   $a0-511-05077-1
035   $a(CKB)111004366730608
035   $a(EBL)144645
035   $a(OCoLC)437250297
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000138127
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11954206
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000138127
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10097101
035   $a(PQKB)10254223
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511485138
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC144645
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL144645
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10014972
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL16181
035   $a(EXLCZ)99111004366730608
100   $a20090226d1998||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aDeviant modernism $esexual and textual errancy in T.S. Eliot, James Joyce, and Marcel Proust /$fColleen Lamos$b[electronic resource]
210  1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d1998.
215   $a1 online resource (x, 269 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
311   $a0-511-00703-5 
311   $a0-521-62418-5 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 230-262) and index.
327   $g1.$tStraightening out literary criticism: T.S. Eliot and error.$tPerversion.$tInversion.$tImpure mingling.$tDissemination --$g2.$tThe end of poetry for ladies: T.S. Eliot's early poetry.$tThe paternal citation.$tThe maternal intertext.$t"Hysteria"$t"Whispers of Immortality"$t"Ode"$tThe Waste Land.$tThe Family Reunion --$g3.$tText of error, text in error: James Joyce's Ulysses.$tJoycean errancy.$tCheating on the law of the father.$tHomosexual secrecy and knowledge --$g4.$tSexual/textual inversion: Marcel Proust.$tThe erotics of reading.$tErrors of affection: Ruskin, Venice, and reading.$tRemembrance of Things Past.
330   $aThis original study re-evaluates central texts of the modernist canon - Eliot's early poetry including The Waste Land, Joyce's Ulysses and Proust's Remembrance of Things Past - by examining sexual energies and identifications in them that are typically regarded as perverse. According to modern cultural discourses and psychosexual categorizations, these deviant desires and identifications feminize men, or tend to render them homosexual. Colleen Lamos's analysis of the operations of gender and sexuality in these texts reveals conflicts, concerning the definition of masculine heterosexuality, which cut across the aesthetics of modernism. She argues that canonical male modernism, far from being a monolithic entity with a coherently conservative political agenda, is in fact the site of errant impulses and unresolved struggles. What emerges is a reconsideration of modernist literature as a whole, and a recognition of the heterogeneous forces which formed and deformed modernism.
606   $aParaphilias in literature
606   $aGender identity in literature
606   $aMasculinity in literature
606   $aModernism (Literature)
606   $aSex in literature
606   $aMen in literature
615  0$aParaphilias in literature.
615  0$aGender identity in literature.
615  0$aMasculinity in literature.
615  0$aModernism (Literature)
615  0$aSex in literature.
615  0$aMen in literature.
676   $a820.9/353
700   $aLamos$b Colleen$01576677
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910778872603321
996   $aDeviant modernism$93854588
997   $aUNINA