LEADER 02998nam  2200613Ia 450 
001 9910778720603321
005 20230421034140.0
010   $a0-19-773076-0
010   $a1-280-45420-2
010   $a0-19-535404-4
010   $a0-585-30894-2
035   $a(CKB)111004366529084
035   $a(EBL)271815
035   $a(OCoLC)476008609
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000191769
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11183614
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000191769
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10186466
035   $a(PQKB)10841802
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL271815
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10278470
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL45420
035   $a(OCoLC)466426474
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC271815
035   $a(EXLCZ)99111004366529084
100   $a19970730d1998      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aLiberalism and affirmative obligation$b[electronic resource] /$fPatricia Smith
210   $aNew York $cOxford University Press$d1998
215   $a1 online resource (273 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-19-511528-7 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 247-255) and index.
327   $aContents; 1. Positive and Negative Duty in the Liberal Tradition: An Overview; 1. Minimal Morality and the Dark Side of Human Nature; 2. The Traditional Doctrine of Positive and Negative Duty; 3. Four Contemporary Challenges; 4. General Positive Duty: The Scope of Charity; 5. Special Positive Duty: An Ignored Moral Category; 2. Special Circumstances and the Bad Samaritan Exception; 3. The Duty of Charity and the Equivalence Thesis; 4. Family Obligations and the Implications of Membership; 5. Family Membership and Reciprocity; 6. The Complexity of Consent in Legal Theory and Practice
327   $a7. Consent and Role in Professional Obligation8. Justifying the Obligations of Neighbors and Citizens; 9. Articulating the Scope of Political Obligation; Epilogue: Motivating Cooperative Individualism, or Why a Liberal Individualist Should Accept Collective Solutions to Large-scale Affirmative Obligations; Notes; Bibliography; Index; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; R; S; T; U; W
330   $aConsiders what a consistently liberal view of affirmative obligation would have to be to accommodate liberal commitments to freedom and justice and also account for issues central to liberal democratic society. The author asserts that this would involve the rejection of atomistic individualism.
606   $aPolitical obligation
606   $aLiberalism
615  0$aPolitical obligation.
615  0$aLiberalism.
676   $a320.51
676   $a320/.01/1
700   $aSmith$b Patricia G$01557145
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910778720603321
996   $aLiberalism and affirmative obligation$93820443
997   $aUNINA