LEADER 02988nam 2200613Ia 450 001 9910778287703321 005 20230828221946.0 010 $a94-012-0433-0 010 $a1-4356-0070-3 035 $a(CKB)1000000000478233 035 $a(EBL)556582 035 $a(OCoLC)714567308 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000229375 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12029258 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000229375 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10171653 035 $a(PQKB)10177516 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC556582 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL556582 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10380207 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000478233 100 $a20070706d2006 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aPropositions$b[electronic resource] $esemantic and ontological issues /$fedited by Massimiliano Carrara and Elisabetta Sacchi 210 $aAmsterdam ;$aNew York $cRodopi$d2006 215 $a1 online resource (259 p.) 225 1 $aGrazer philosophische Studien,$x0165-9227 ;$v72 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-420-2194-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aTable of Contents; Propositions. An Introduction; Ascent, Propositions and Other Formal Objects; Colouring, Multiple Propositions, and Assertoric Content; Fregean Propositions and Their Graspability; Numbers, Reference and Russellian Propositions; On the Sameness of the Thoughts. Substitutional Quantifiers, Tense, and Belief; True In a Sense; Speech Acts Without Propositions?; How to Get a Non-Intensionalist, Propositional, Moderately Realist Truthconditional Account of Internal Metafictional Sentences; Fictional Propositions and the Unprovability of Consistency 327 $aPropositions and Necessary ExistenceNegation 330 $aThis special issue of GPS collects 11 papers (and a long introduction), by leading philosophers and young researchers, which tackle more or less from close the topic of propositions by trying to provide the reader with a cross-section of the ongoing debate in this area. The raised issues range over the semantics, the ontology, the epistemology, and the philosophy of mathematics and stimulate the reader to reflect on crucial problems such as the following: are propositions objects? In the positive case, what kind of objects are they? Can they be grasped by cognitive creatures such as we are? Wh 410 0$aGrazer philosophische Studien ;$v72. 606 $aProposition (Logic) 606 $aSemantics 606 $aOntology 615 0$aProposition (Logic) 615 0$aSemantics. 615 0$aOntology. 676 $a111 701 $aCarrara$b Massimiliano$01476962 701 $aSacchi$b Elisabetta$f1964-$0232237 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910778287703321 996 $aPropositions$93691777 997 $aUNINA