LEADER 03740nam  2200973 a 450 
001 9910778070703321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-282-38300-0
010   $a9786612383007
010   $a0-520-90811-2
024 7 $a10.1525/9780520908116
035   $a(CKB)1000000000767239
035   $a(EBL)470866
035   $a(OCoLC)609849958
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000400677
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11257761
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000400677
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10396099
035   $a(PQKB)10307746
035   $a(OCoLC)777467264
035   $a(MdBmJHUP)muse30531
035   $a(DE-B1597)519390
035   $a(DE-B1597)9780520908116
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL470866
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10676174
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL238300
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC470866
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000767239
100   $a19840229d1984      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aScience and values$b[electronic resource] $ethe aims of science and their role in scientific debate /$fLarry Laudan
210   $aBerkeley $cUniversity of California Press$dc1984
215   $a1 online resource (165 p.)
225 1 $aPittsburgh series in philosophy and history of science ;$vv. 11
300   $aIncludes index.
311   $a0-520-05743-0 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 141-144) and index.
327   $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tAcknowledgments -- $tPreface -- $tOne. Two Puzzles About Science: Reflections On Some Crises In Philosophy And Sociology Of Science -- $tTwo. The Hierarchical Structure Of Scientific Debates -- $tThree. Closing The Evaluative Circle: Resolving Disagreements About Cognitive Values -- $tFour. Dissecting The Holist Picture Of Scientific Change -- $tFive. A Reticulational Critique Of Realist Axiology And Methodology -- $tEpilogue -- $tReferences -- $tIndex
330   $aLaudan constructs a fresh approach to a longtime problem for the philosopher of science: how to explain the simultaneous and widespread presence of both agreement and disagreement in science. Laudan critiques the logical empiricists and the post-positivists as he stresses the need for centrality and values and the interdependence of values, methods, and facts as prerequisites to solving the problems of consensus and dissent in science.
410  0$aPittsburgh series in philosophy and history of science ;$vv. 11.
606   $aScience$xPhilosophy
610   $acognitive values.
610   $aconsensus.
610   $acovariance fallacy.
610   $adecision making.
610   $adissent.
610   $aempirical evidence.
610   $aempiricism.
610   $aethics.
610   $agoal evaluation.
610   $akuhn.
610   $alogic.
610   $amethodology.
610   $anatural sciences.
610   $anonfiction.
610   $aphilosophy of science.
610   $aphilosophy.
610   $apost positivism.
610   $arealist axiology.
610   $aresearch.
610   $areticulated model.
610   $ascience and technology.
610   $ascience.
610   $ascientific change.
610   $ascientific community.
610   $ascientific debate.
610   $ascientific knowledge.
610   $ascientific method.
610   $ascientific rationality.
610   $ascientific revolutions.
615  0$aScience$xPhilosophy.
676   $a501
700   $aLaudan$b Larry$045161
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910778070703321
996   $aScience and values$951474
997   $aUNINA