LEADER 03780nam 2200649 a 450 001 9910778037503321 005 20230721022317.0 010 $a0-309-17748-0 010 $a1-282-13041-2 010 $a9786612130410 010 $a0-309-12684-3 035 $a(CKB)1000000000786332 035 $a(EBL)3378486 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000106764 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11134000 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000106764 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10111030 035 $a(PQKB)10311690 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3378486 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10309974 035 $a(OCoLC)923280127 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4961440 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL213041 035 $a(OCoLC)435814444 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3378486 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000786332 100 $a20091005d2009 uh 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aAssessment of explosive destruction technologies for specific munitions at the Blue Grass and Pueblo chemical agent destruction pilot plants /$fCommittee to Review Assembled Chemical Weapons Alternatives Program Detonation technologies, Board on Army Science and Technology, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council of the National Academies 210 $aWashington, D.C. $cNational Academies Press$d2009 215 $a1 online resource (xviii, 115 pages) $cillustrations 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 1 $a0-309-12683-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $a""Preface""; ""Acknowledgment of Reviewers""; ""Contents""; ""Tables and Figures""; ""Acronyms and Abbreviations""; ""Summary""; ""1 Introduction""; ""2 Evaluation Factors Specific to ACWA Sites Application""; ""3 Current Status of Explosive Destruction Technologies""; ""4 Rating of Explosive Destruction Technologies for Proposed BGCAPP and PCAPP Applications""; ""Appendixes""; ""Appendix A: Chapter 4 from the 2006 NRC Report *Review of International Technologies for Destruction of Recovered Chemical Warfare Materiel*""; ""Appendix B: Committee Meetings and Site Visits"" 327 $a""Appendix C: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members"" 330 $aThe Army's ability to meet public and congressional demands to destroy expeditiously all of the U.S. declared chemical weapons would be enhanced by the selection and acquisition of appropriate explosive destruction technologies (EDTs) to augment the main technologies to be used to destroy the chemical weapons currently at the Blue Grass Army Depot (BGAD) in Kentucky and the Pueblo Chemical Depot (PCD) in Colorado. The Army is considering four EDTs for the destruction of chemical weapons: three from private sector vendors, and a fourth, Army-developed explosive destruction system (EDS). 606 $aChemical weapons disposal$zKentucky$zRichmond 606 $aChemical weapons disposal$zColorado$zPueblo 615 0$aChemical weapons disposal 615 0$aChemical weapons disposal 676 $a623.4 712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bBoard on Army Science and Technology. 712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bDivision on Engineering and Physical Sciences. 712 02$aNational Academies Press (U.S.) 712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bCommittee to Review Assembled Chemical Weapons Alternatives Program Detonation Technologies. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910778037503321 996 $aAssessment of explosive destruction technologies for specific munitions at the Blue Grass and Pueblo chemical agent destruction pilot plants$93776245 997 $aUNINA