LEADER 03563nam  22006254a 450 
001 9910777859503321
005 20230607221936.0
010   $a1-281-74060-8
010   $a9786611740603
010   $a0-300-12700-6
024 7 $a10.12987/9780300127003
035   $a(CKB)1000000000471994
035   $a(EBL)3420031
035   $a(OCoLC)923590014
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000116072
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11143674
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000116072
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10026817
035   $a(PQKB)11033100
035   $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000165639
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3420031
035   $a(DE-B1597)485153
035   $a(OCoLC)1100435858
035   $a(DE-B1597)9780300127003
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3420031
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10170057
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000471994
100   $a20020123d2002      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aBush v. Gore$b[electronic resource] $ethe question of legitimacy /$fedited by Bruce Ackerman
210   $aNew Haven $cYale University Press$dc2002
215   $a1 online resource (255 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-300-09379-9 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aAn unreasonable reaction to a reasonable decision / Charles Fried -- Not as bad as Plessy. Worse / Jed Rubenfeld -- EroG v. hsuB : through the looking glass / Laurence H. Tribe -- In partial (but not partisan) praise of principle / Guido Calabresi -- The fallibility of reason / Owen Fiss -- Sustaining the premise of legality : learning to live with Bush v. Gore / Robert Post -- Can the rule of law survive Bush v. Gore / Margaret Jane Radin -- A political question / Steven G. Calabresi -- Political questions and the hazards of pragmatism / Jeffrey Rosen -- The conservatism in Bush v. Gore / Mark Tushnet -- Does the constitution enact the republican party platform? : beyond Bush v. Gore / Cass R. Sunstein -- Off balance / Bruce Ackerman -- Legitimacy and the 2000 election / Jack M. Balkin.
330   $aThe Supreme Court's intervention in the 2000 election will shape American law and democracy long after George W. Bush has left the White House. This vitally important book brings together a broad range of preeminent legal scholars who address the larger questions raised by the Supreme Court's actions. Did the Court's decision violate the rule of law? Did it inaugurate an era of super-politicized jurisprudence? How should Bush v. Gore change the terms of debate over the next round of Supreme Court appointments?The contributors-Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin, Guido Calabresi, Steven Calabresi, Owen Fiss, Charles Fried, Robert Post, Margaret Jane Radin, Jeffrey Rosen, Jed Rubenfeld, Cass Sunstein, Laurence Tribe, and Mark Tushnet-represent a broad political spectrum. Their reactions to the case are varied and surprising, filled with sparkling argument and spirited debate. This is a must-read book for thoughtful Americans everywhere.
517 3 $aBush versus Gore
606   $aPresidents$zUnited States$xElection$y2000
606   $aContested elections$zFlorida
615  0$aPresidents$xElection
615  0$aContested elections
676   $a342.73/075
701   $aAckerman$b Bruce A$0123194
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910777859503321
996   $aBush v. Gore$93716350
997   $aUNINA