LEADER 02509nam 2200637Ia 450 001 9910777487003321 005 20230331005537.0 010 $a0-19-771887-6 010 $a1-280-52483-9 010 $a0-19-536251-9 035 $a(CKB)1000000000414836 035 $a(EBL)272871 035 $a(OCoLC)476013014 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000135623 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11162684 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000135623 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10064568 035 $a(PQKB)10445344 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL272871 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10278724 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL52483 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC272871 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000414836 100 $a19900221d1991 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe death of the irreparable injury rule$b[electronic resource] /$fDouglas Laycock 210 $aNew York $cOxford University Press$dc1991 215 $a1 online resource (375 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-19-506356-2 327 $aContents; 1. A Functional Approach to Choosing Remedies; 2. Irreplaceability; 3. Other Means of Escaping the Rule; 4. Why Courts Invoke the Rule; 5. Preliminary Relief; 6. Deference to Other Authority; 7. Avoiding Over Enforcement; 8. Other Substantive Reasons; 9. Other Procedural Reasons; 10. The Disparate Uses of a Code Phrase; 11. Holmes, Posner, and Efficient Breach; 12. Conforming Doctrine to Reality; TABLE OF CASES; TABLE OF SECONDARY SOURCES; INDEX 330 $aDrawing on an analysis of numerous cases, the author argues that the ""irreparable injury"" rule is defunct, since it no longer constrains a court's choice of remedy. He proposes new injury rules based on actual practice. 606 $aEquitable remedies$zUnited States 606 $aEquity$zUnited States 606 $aInjunctions$zUnited States 606 $aRemedies (Law)$zUnited States 606 $aSpecific performance$zUnited States 615 0$aEquitable remedies 615 0$aEquity 615 0$aInjunctions 615 0$aRemedies (Law) 615 0$aSpecific performance 676 $a346.7303/23 676 $a347.306323 700 $aLaycock$b Douglas$01519397 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910777487003321 996 $aThe death of the irreparable injury rule$93834644 997 $aUNINA