LEADER 03690nam 22007212 450 001 9910777058203321 005 20151005020621.0 010 $a1-107-17723-5 010 $a1-281-24334-5 010 $a9786611243340 010 $a0-511-37791-6 010 $a0-511-49538-2 010 $a0-511-37700-2 010 $a0-511-37606-5 010 $a0-511-37456-9 010 $a0-511-37880-7 035 $a(CKB)1000000000414201 035 $a(EBL)328904 035 $a(OCoLC)437197080 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000189934 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12020274 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000189934 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10166594 035 $a(PQKB)11053502 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511495380 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC328904 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL328904 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10221558 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL124334 035 $a(PPN)261355708 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000414201 100 $a20090306d2007|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aLaw, legitimacy, and the rationing of healthcare $ea contextual and comparative perspective /$fKeith Syrett$b[electronic resource] 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2007. 215 $a1 online resource (xiii, 252 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 225 1 $aCambridge law, medicine, and ethics ;$v6 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 $a0-521-67445-X 311 $a0-521-85773-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aWhy 'ration' healthcare resources? -- How rationing takes place? -- Rationing and the problem of legitimacy -- Rationing and the courts: theoretical perspectives -- Rationing in the courts: England -- Rationing in the courts: Canada -- Rationing in the courts: South Africa. 330 $aDr Keith Syrett argues for a reappraisal of the role of public law adjudication in questions of healthcare rationing. As governments worldwide turn to explicit rationing strategies to manage the mismatch between demand for and supply of health services and treatments, disappointed patients and the public have sought to contest the moral authority of bodies making rationing decisions. This has led to the growing involvement of law in this field of public policy. The author argues that, rather than bemoaning this development, those working within the health policy community should recognise the points of confluence between the principles and purposes of public law and the proposals which have been made to address rationing's 'legitimacy problem'. Drawing upon jurisprudence from England, Canada and South Africa, the book evaluates the capacity of courts to establish the conditions for a process of public deliberation from which legitimacy for healthcare rationing may be derived. 410 0$aCambridge law, medicine, and ethics ;$v6. 517 3 $aLaw, Legitimacy & the Rationing of Health Care 606 $aHealth care rationing$xLaw and legislation 606 $aHealth care rationing$xGovernment policy 606 $aHealth care rationing$xMoral and ethical aspects 615 0$aHealth care rationing$xLaw and legislation. 615 0$aHealth care rationing$xGovernment policy. 615 0$aHealth care rationing$xMoral and ethical aspects. 676 $a344.041 700 $aSyrett$b Keith$0850542 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910777058203321 996 $aLaw, legitimacy, and the rationing of healthcare$93786111 997 $aUNINA