LEADER 02412nam 2200385 450 001 9910774893703321 005 20230217144704.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000000567701 035 $a(NjHacI)995470000000567701 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000000567701 100 $a20230217d2021 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aCategoriality and continuity in prosodic prominence /$fSimon Roessig 210 1$aBerlin :$cLanguage Science Press,$d2021. 210 4$dİ2021 215 $a1 online resource (ii, 174 pages) 225 1 $aStudies in laboratory phonology, ;$v10 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 330 $aProsody has been characterised as a "half-tamed savage" being shaped by both discrete, categorical aspects as well as gradient, continuous phenomena. This book is concerned with the relation of the "wild" and the "tamed" sides of prosodic prominence. It reviews problems that arise from a strict separation of categorical and continuous representations in models of phonetics and phonology, and it explores the potential role of descriptions aimed at reconciling the two domains. In doing so, the book offers an introduction to dynamical systems, a framework that has been studied extensively in the last decades to model speech production and perception. The reported acoustic and articulatory data presented in this book show that categorical and continuous modulations used to enhance prosodic prominence are deeply intertwined and even exhibit a kind of symbiosis. A multi-dimensional dynamical model of prosodic prominence is sketched, based on the empirical data, combining tonal and articulatory aspects of prosodic focus marking. The model demonstrates how categorical and continuous aspects can be inte- grated in a joint theoretical treatment that overcomes a strict separation of phonetics and phonology. 410 0$aStudies in laboratory phonology ;$v10. 517 $aCategoriality and continuity in prosodic prominence 606 $aLanguage arts 615 0$aLanguage arts. 676 $a372.6 700 $aRoessig$b Simon$01276284 801 0$bNjHacI 801 1$bNjHacl 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910774893703321 996 $aCategoriality and continuity in prosodic prominence$93007481 997 $aUNINA