LEADER 03376 am 2200469 n 450 001 9910768382703321 005 20230525 010 $a979-1-03-620652-8 024 7 $a10.4000/books.enseditions.45560 035 $a(CKB)5700000000382180 035 $a(FrMaCLE)OB-enseditions-45560 035 $a(PPN)270386270 035 $a(EXLCZ)995700000000382180 100 $a20230523j|||||||| ||| 0 101 0 $afre 135 $auu||||||m|||| 200 13$aUn divan à Delhi $ePsychothérapie et individualisme dans l?Inde contemporaine /$fAnne Gagnant de Weck 210 $aLyon $cENS Éditions$d2023 215 $a1 online resource (272 p.) 311 $a979-1-03-620650-4 330 $aDepuis le tournant libéral des années 1990, les psychothérapies sont en plein essor dans la société indienne. Ce livre, consacré au cas particulier de la psychanalyse à Delhi, décrit la façon dont cette nouvelle pratique s?insère dans les modes de vie. Pourquoi la thérapie devient-elle une pratique de plus en plus répandue ? À quel besoin cela répond-il ? Comment les structures sociales du monde indien imprègnent-elle la thérapie et quelles sont les particularités de la thérapie à l?indienne, par comparaison avec ses autres déclinaisons (européennes ou nord-américaines notamment) ? À partir d?une riche ethnographie et de nombreuses études de cas, Anne Gagnant de Weck montre en quoi l?expérience contemporaine de la thérapie reflète les tensions occasionnées par la progression ? très contestée ? des valeurs individualistes (d?autonomie, de choix et de bonheur personnel) dans une société de castes réputée pour sanctifier le groupe et dénier toute valeur à l?individu. En articulant ainsi une question sur le sens de la thérapie dans des vies individuelles avec une question sur la forme de son dispositif, l?autrice offre une description riche et nuancée, au prisme de l?intime, de l?univers mental de la « nouvelle classe moyenne » indienne et permet de faire progresser notre propre connaissance de la psychanalyse. Since the liberal turn of the 1990s, psychotherapies have been booming in Indian society. This book, devoted to the particular case of psychoanalysis in Delhi, describes how this new practice is becoming part of of new lifestyles. Why is therapy becoming an increasingly common practice? What need does it meet? How does the social structure of the Indian world influence therapy and what are the particularities of Indian-style therapy, compared to its other variations (European or North American in particular)? Based on a rich ethnography and many case studies, Anne Gagnant de Weck shows how the contemporary experience of therapy reflects the tensions caused by? 606 $aPsychology 606 $apsychanalyse 606 $athérapie 606 $aindividualisme 606 $apsychoanalysis 606 $atherapy 606 $aindividualism 615 4$aPsychology 615 4$apsychanalyse 615 4$athérapie 615 4$aindividualisme 615 4$apsychoanalysis 615 4$atherapy 615 4$aindividualism 700 $aGagnant de Weck$b Anne$01454065 701 $aEhrenberg$b Alain$0241908 801 0$bFR-FrMaCLE 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910768382703321 996 $aUn divan à Delhi$93656769 997 $aUNINA LEADER 06023nam 2201321 a 450 001 9910781478203321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-283-15256-8 010 $a9786613152565 010 $a1-4008-4033-3 024 7 $a10.1515/9781400840335 035 $a(CKB)2550000000040808 035 $a(EBL)726054 035 $a(OCoLC)742516953 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000525034 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11325128 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000525034 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10488968 035 $a(PQKB)10540325 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC726054 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000406832 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse43158 035 $a(DE-B1597)453772 035 $a(OCoLC)979968529 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781400840335 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL726054 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10480680 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL315256 035 $a(PPN)162139284 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000040808 100 $a20110127d2011 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe priority of democracy$b[electronic resource] $epolitical consequences of pragmatism /$fJack Knight and James Johnson 205 $aCourse Book 210 $aPrinceton [N.J.] $cPrinceton University Press$dc2011 215 $a1 online resource (343 p.) 225 0 $aA Princeton University Press e-book 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-691-16333-2 311 $a0-691-15123-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aPreliminaries -- Pragmatism and the problem of institutional design -- The appeal of decentralization -- The priority of democracy and the burden of justification -- Reconsidering the role of political argument in democratic politics -- Refining reflexivity -- Formal conditions : institutionalizing liberal guarantees -- Substantive conditions : pragmatism and effectiveness. 330 $aPragmatism and its consequences are central issues in American politics today, yet scholars rarely examine in detail the relationship between pragmatism and politics. In The Priority of Democracy, Jack Knight and James Johnson systematically explore the subject and make a strong case for adopting a pragmatist approach to democratic politics--and for giving priority to democracy in the process of selecting and reforming political institutions. What is the primary value of democracy? When should we make decisions democratically and when should we rely on markets? And when should we accept the decisions of unelected officials, such as judges or bureaucrats? Knight and Johnson explore how a commitment to pragmatism should affect our answers to such important questions. They conclude that democracy is a good way of determining how these kinds of decisions should be made--even if what the democratic process determines is that not all decisions should be made democratically. So, for example, the democratically elected U.S. Congress may legitimately remove monetary policy from democratic decision-making by putting it under the control of the Federal Reserve. Knight and Johnson argue that pragmatism offers an original and compelling justification of democracy in terms of the unique contributions democratic institutions can make to processes of institutional choice. This focus highlights the important role that democracy plays, not in achieving consensus or commonality, but rather in addressing conflicts. Indeed, Knight and Johnson suggest that democratic politics is perhaps best seen less as a way of reaching consensus or agreement than as a way of structuring the terms of persistent disagreement. 606 $aDemocracy$xPhilosophy 610 $aAmerican politics. 610 $aU.S. Congress. 610 $aambiguity. 610 $aanti-skepticism. 610 $aargument. 610 $abureaucracy. 610 $acollective decision making. 610 $acollective decision. 610 $acollective decisions. 610 $acollective outcomes. 610 $aconsequentialism. 610 $adecentralized markets. 610 $adecentralized mechanisms. 610 $ademocracy. 610 $ademocratic argument. 610 $ademocratic arrangements. 610 $ademocratic competition. 610 $ademocratic decision making. 610 $ademocratic institutional framework. 610 $ademocratic institutions. 610 $ademocratic politics. 610 $ademocratic process. 610 $ademocratic processes. 610 $adiversity. 610 $aeffective participation. 610 $aequal political participation. 610 $aequality. 610 $afallibilism. 610 $aformal decision making. 610 $afree-and-equal-participation. 610 $afreedom. 610 $aindividual participation. 610 $ainstability. 610 $ainstitutional arrangements. 610 $ainstitutional choice. 610 $ainstitutional performance. 610 $ajudicial decision making. 610 $aliberalism. 610 $amarkets. 610 $apolitical argument. 610 $apolitical consequences. 610 $apolitical debate. 610 $apolitical-economic institutions. 610 $apopulism. 610 $apragmatism. 610 $areflexivity. 610 $asocial choice theory. 610 $asocial choice. 610 $asocial cooperation. 610 $asocial disagreement. 610 $asocial interaction. 610 $asocial norms. 610 $avoting. 615 0$aDemocracy$xPhilosophy. 676 $a321.8 700 $aKnight$b Jack$f1952-$0621975 701 $aJohnson$b James$f1955-$0817792 712 02$aRussell Sage Foundation, 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910781478203321 996 $aThe priority of democracy$93838841 997 $aUNINA