LEADER 03948nam 22006015 450 001 9910767549903321 005 20251230061537.0 010 $a981-15-9685-9 024 7 $a10.1007/978-981-15-9685-8 035 $a(CKB)4100000011660651 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6425619 035 $a(DE-He213)978-981-15-9685-8 035 $a(PPN)252513479 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000011660651 100 $a20201214d2021 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn|008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 12$aA Dialogue Between Law and History $eProceedings of the Second International Conference on Facts and Evidence /$fedited by Baosheng Zhang, Thomas Yunlong Man, Jing Lin 205 $a1st ed. 2021. 210 1$aSingapore :$cSpringer Nature Singapore :$cImprint: Springer,$d2021. 215 $a1 online resource (X, 411 p. 8 illus., 4 illus. in color.) 311 08$a981-15-9684-0 330 $aThis book builds on the success of the First International Conference on Facts and Evidence: A Dialogue between Law and Philosophy (Shanghai, China, May 2016), which was co-hosted by the Collaborative Innovation Center of Judicial Civilization (CICJC) and East China Normal University. The Second International Conference on Facts and Evidence: A Dialogue between Law and History was jointly organized by the CICJC, the Institute of Evidence Law and Forensic Science (ELFS) at China University of Political Science and Law (CUPL), and Peking University School of Transnational Law (STL) in Shenzhen, China, on November 16?17, 2019. Historians, legal scholars and legal practitioners share the same interest in ascertaining the ?truth? in their respective professional endeavors. It is generally recognized that any historical study without truthful narration of historical events is fiction and that any judicial trial without accurate fact-finding is a miscarriage of justice. In both historical research and the judicial process, practitioners are invariably called upon, before making any arguments, to prove the underlying facts using evidence, regardless of how the concept is defined or employed in different academic or practical contexts. Thus, historians and legal professionals have respectively developed theories and methodological tools to inform and explain the process of gathering evidentiary proof. When lawyers and judges reconsider the facts of cases, ?questions of law? are actually a subset of ?questions of fact,? and thus, the legal interpretation process also involves questions of ?historical fact.? The book brings together more than twenty leading history and legal scholars from around the world to explore a range of issues concerning the role of facts as evidence in both disciplines. As such, the book is of enduring value to historians, legal scholars and everyone interested in truth-seeking. 606 $aPrivate international law 606 $aConflict of laws 606 $aInternational law 606 $aComparative law 606 $aLaw$xPhilosophy 606 $aLaw$xHistory 606 $aPrivate International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law 606 $aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History 615 0$aPrivate international law. 615 0$aConflict of laws. 615 0$aInternational law. 615 0$aComparative law. 615 0$aLaw$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aLaw$xHistory. 615 14$aPrivate International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law. 615 24$aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. 676 $a340.1 702 $aZhang$b Baosheng 702 $aMan$b Thomas Yunlong 702 $aLin$b Jing 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910767549903321 996 $aA dialogue between law and history$93655513 997 $aUNINA