LEADER 03827nam 22008413 450 001 9910765858803321 005 20241107094447.0 010 $a9786610226184 010 $a9781135875992 010 $a1135875995 010 $a9781135876005 010 $a1135876002 010 $a9781280226182 010 $a1280226188 010 $a9780203506394 010 $a0203506391 024 7 $a10.4324/9780203506394 035 $a(CKB)1000000000252606 035 $a(EBL)3060482 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000221156 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11197524 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000221156 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10161858 035 $a(PQKB)10883167 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3060482 035 $a(OCoLC)62110220 035 $a(OCoLC)1052215849 035 $a(OCoLC-P)1052215849 035 $a(FlBoTFG)9780203506394 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/29559 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7244922 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7244922 035 $a(OCoLC)1135849412 035 $a(ODN)ODN0004065305 035 $a(ScCtBLL)56f9e1b6-43dd-4820-8ee2-dfdbe0dc7bc6 035 $a(oapen)doab29559 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000252606 100 $a20231110h20172005 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aPhonological augmentation in prominent positions /$fJennifer L. Smith 205 $a1st 210 $d2004 210 1$aAbingdon, Oxon :$cRoutledge,$d2017. 210 4$dİ2005 215 $a1 online resource (323 p.) 225 1 $aOutstanding dissertations in linguistics 300 $aRevised version of the author's dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amhurst, 2002. 311 08$a0-415-97107-1 311 08$a0-415-86149-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aPages:1 to 25; Pages:26 to 50; Pages:51 to 75; Pages:76 to 100; Pages:101 to 125; Pages:126 to 150; Pages:151 to 175; Pages:176 to 200; Pages:201 to 225; Pages:226 to 250; Pages:251 to 275; Pages:276 to 300; Pages:301 to 323 330 $aPhonologically prominent or "strong" positions are well known for their ability to resist positional neutralization processes such as vowel reduction or place assimilation. However, there are also cases of neutralization that affect only strong positions, as when stressed syllables must be heavy, default stress is inserted into roots, or word-initial onsets must be low in sonority. In this book, Jennifer Smith shows that phonological processes specific to strong positions are distinct from those involved in classic positional neutralization effects because they always serve to augment the strong position with a perceptually salient characteristic. Formally, positional augmentation effects are modeled by means of markedness constraints relativized to strong positions. Because positional augmentation constraints are subject to certain substantive restrictions, as seen in their connection to perceptual salience, this study has implications for the relationship between functional grounding and phonological theory. 410 0$aOutstanding dissertations in linguistics. 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xPhonology 606 $aPsycholinguistics 606 $aOptimality theory (Linguistics) 615 0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xPhonology. 615 0$aPsycholinguistics. 615 0$aOptimality theory (Linguistics) 676 $a414 686 $aLAN000000$aLAN009000$2bisacsh 700 $aSmith$b Jennifer L.$f1971-$01262139 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910765858803321 996 $aPhonological Augmentation in Prominent Positions$92948623 997 $aUNINA