LEADER 04327nam 22007335 450 001 9910741193403321 005 20230821073823.0 010 $a3-031-32736-5 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-031-32736-0 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC30717225 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL30717225 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-031-32736-0 035 $a(CKB)28011026500041 035 $a(EXLCZ)9928011026500041 100 $a20230821d2023 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aConfrontation in Academic Communication /$fby Irena Vassileva 205 $a1st ed. 2023. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer Nature Switzerland :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2023. 215 $a1 online resource (121 pages) 311 08$aPrint version: Vassileva, Irena Confrontation in Academic Communication Cham : Palgrave Macmillan,c2023 9783031327353 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aChapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Aim and methodology of the study -- Chapter 3. Confrontation in academic communication ? theoretical background -- Chapter 4. The academic book review -- Chapter 5. The ?academic war? ? a case study -- Chapter 6. Confrontation and the academic discourse community Revisited. 330 $aThis book examines the argumentation strategies employed by linguists in voicing criticism, looks for explanations for confrontation in academic discourse, and evaluates the positive and/or negative effects it has on international academic communication. Issues such as the role of intertextuality, cross-cultural variations, and the notion of ?academic discourse community? are also touched upon. Special attention is paid to the modern developments in contrastive rhetoric studies, as well as to the controversial issue of the use of context-based versus corpus-based methods. The corpus under investigation consists of academic book reviews in English and German with a clearly stated negative character, as well as a series of publications in English interrelated by the fact that they discuss a common group of problems but from two fully confrontative points of view. They illustrate what has been called an ?academic war?. Some related theoretical issues are also discussed, including the role of evaluation in academic communication, the relationship between criticism, critique, negative evaluation, and confrontation in academic communication, as well as the importance of culture, discipline culture, and communities of practice. The contrastive discourse analysis demonstrates differences between English and German in terms of the rhetorical strategies employed by review writers to express criticism. The book will be of interest to researchers in the fields of academic communication and rhetorics, as well as teachers in English/German for academic purposes. Irena Vassileva is Professor of English and German Linguistics in the Department of Foreign Languages and Cultures at New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria. 606 $aLinguistics$xMethodology 606 $aPenmanship 606 $aLanguage and languages$xStyle 606 $aRhetoric 606 $aCommunication in science 606 $aTechnology 606 $aScience 606 $aGermanic languages 606 $aResearch Methods in Language and Linguistics 606 $aWriting Skills 606 $aRhetorics 606 $aRhetoric of Science and Technology 606 $aGermanic Languages 615 0$aLinguistics$xMethodology. 615 0$aPenmanship. 615 0$aLanguage and languages$xStyle. 615 0$aRhetoric. 615 0$aCommunication in science. 615 0$aTechnology. 615 0$aScience. 615 0$aGermanic languages. 615 14$aResearch Methods in Language and Linguistics. 615 24$aWriting Skills. 615 24$aRhetorics. 615 24$aRhetoric of Science and Technology. 615 24$aGermanic Languages. 676 $a031 676 $a808.02 700 $aVassileva$b Irena$01424095 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910741193403321 996 $aConfrontation in Academic Communication$93552980 997 $aUNINA