LEADER 03090nam  2200553 a 450 
001 9910739431503321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-4614-6504-4
024 7 $a10.1007/978-1-4614-6504-1
035   $a(CKB)3280000000020525
035   $a(EBL)1316990
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000904303
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11545182
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000904303
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10920643
035   $a(PQKB)11615992
035   $a(DE-He213)978-1-4614-6504-1
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1316990
035   $a(PPN)170487644
035   $a(EXLCZ)993280000000020525
100   $a20130605d2013      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aMaking the DSM-5 $econcepts and controversies /$fJoel Paris, James Phillips, editors
205   $a1st ed. 2013.
210   $aNew York $cSpringer$d2013
215   $a1 online resource (182 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a1-4614-6503-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $apt. 1. Historical/Ideological perspectives -- pt. 2. Ideological and conceptual perspectives -- pt. 3. Conceptual perspectives.
330   $aIn 2013, the American Psychiatric Association published the 5th edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Often referred to as the ?bible? of psychiatry, the manual only classifies mental disorders and does not explain them or guide their treatment. While science should be the basis of any diagnostic system, to date, there is no knowledge on whether most conditions listed in the manual are true diseases. Moreover, in DSM-5 the overall definition of mental disorder is weak, failing to distinguish psychopathology from normality. In spite of all the progress that has been made in neuroscience over the last few decades, the psychiatric community is no closer to understanding the etiology and pathogenesis of mental disorders than it was fifty years ago.   In Making the DSM-5, prominent experts delve into the debate about psychiatric nosology and examine the conceptual and pragmatic issues underlying the new manual. While retracing the historic controversy over DSM, considering the political context and economic impact of the manual, and focusing on what was revised or left unchanged in the new edition, this timely volume addresses the main concerns of the future of psychiatry and questions whether the DSM legacy can truly improve the specialty and advance its goals. .
606   $aPsychiatry$xHistory$y20th century$zUnited States
606   $aMental illness$xClassification$zUnited States
615  0$aPsychiatry$xHistory
615  0$aMental illness$xClassification
676   $a616.89075
701   $aParis$b Joel$0296327
701   $aPhillips$b James$01756706
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910739431503321
996   $aMaking the DSM-5$94194154
997   $aUNINA