LEADER 04572nam  22008175  450 
001 9910739404803321
005 20200920012642.0
010   $a3-642-35597-8
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-642-35597-4
035   $a(CKB)2670000000388566
035   $a(EBL)1106163
035   $a(OCoLC)851315282
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000935663
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11546591
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000935663
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10955358
035   $a(PQKB)10647484
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-642-35597-4
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1106163
035   $a(PPN)170490637
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000388566
100   $a20130612d2013      u|             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aEuropean Ship Recycling Regulation$b[electronic resource] $eEntry-Into-Force Implications of the Hong Kong Convention /$fby Urs Daniel Engels
205   $a1st ed. 2013.
210  1$aBerlin, Heidelberg :$cSpringer Berlin Heidelberg :$cImprint: Springer,$d2013.
215   $a1 online resource (328 p.)
225 1 $aHamburg Studies on Maritime Affairs, International Max Planck Research School for Maritime Affairs at the University of Hamburg,$x1614-2462 ;$v24
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a3-642-35596-X 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $aIntroduction -- The Hong Kong Convention -- Entry-Into-Force Provision -- European Ship Recycling Regulation -- Conclusions and Perspectives.
330   $aThis study provides an in-depth analysis of the Hong Kong Ship Recycling Convention as adopted in May 2009 and a thorough analysis of the overall status quo of ship recycling regulations. It investigates the lack of sufficient ratifications of the Convention from both a legal and an economic perspective. The first part of the study focuses on the history of the Convention?s entry-into-force provision and the rationale behind it. Due to the fact that this provision provides a considerable additional obstacle to the Convention?s becoming legally binding, in the second part the focus of the work shifts to unilateral action in this field. An overview of the legal environment of European ship recycling legislation is followed by an analysis and evaluation of a number of proposals by the European Commission attempting to tackle the problems of current ship recycling procedures. With a particular emphasis on (planned) European measures in this regard, the analysis? overall message is one of cautious optimism.
410  0$aHamburg Studies on Maritime Affairs, International Max Planck Research School for Maritime Affairs at the University of Hamburg,$x1614-2462 ;$v24
606   $aLaw of the sea
606   $aInternational law
606   $aLaw?Europe
606   $aEnvironmental economics
606   $aInternational environmental law
606   $aTrade
606   $aIndustrial organization
606   $aLaw of the Sea, Air and Outer Space$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R19060
606   $aEuropean Law$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R20000
606   $aEnvironmental Economics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/W48000
606   $aInternational Environmental Law$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R19070
606   $aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R19050
606   $aIndustrial Organization$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/W31010
615  0$aLaw of the sea.
615  0$aInternational law.
615  0$aLaw?Europe.
615  0$aEnvironmental economics.
615  0$aInternational environmental law.
615  0$aTrade.
615  0$aIndustrial organization.
615 14$aLaw of the Sea, Air and Outer Space.
615 24$aEuropean Law.
615 24$aEnvironmental Economics.
615 24$aInternational Environmental Law.
615 24$aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law.
615 24$aIndustrial Organization.
676   $a343.0968
700   $aEngels$b Urs Daniel$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01424008
712 02$aInternational Max Planck Research School for Maritime Affairs.
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910739404803321
996   $aEuropean Ship Recycling Regulation$93552801
997   $aUNINA