LEADER 03214nam 22004453 450 001 9910735090003321 005 20230825084622.0 010 $a1-00-338425-0 010 $a1-000-95326-2 010 $a1-003-38425-0 035 $a(CKB)27646785900041 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7270917 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7270917 035 $a(EXLCZ)9927646785900041 100 $a20230825d2023 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe Dialectic of Ressentiment $ePedagogy of a Concept 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aMilton :$cTaylor & Francis Group,$d2023. 210 4$dİ2024. 215 $a1 online resource (323 pages) 311 $a9781032470214 330 $a"Drawing upon a wide variety of authors, approaches, and ideological contexts, this book offers a comprehensive and detailed critique of the distinct and polemical senses in which the concept of ressentiment (and its cognate 'resentment') is used today. It also proposes a new mode of addressing ressentiment in which critique and polemics no longer set the tone. Contemporary tendencies in political culture such as neoliberalism, nationalism, populism,identity politics, and large-scale conspiracy theories have led to the return of the concept of ressentiment in armchair political analysis. This book argues that, due to the tension between its enormous descriptive power and its mutually contradicting ideological performances, it is necessary to 'redramatize' the concept of ressentiment. Inspired by Marxist political epistemology, affect theory, postcolonialism, and feminism, the book maps, delimits, and assesses four irreducible ways in which ressentiment can be articulated: the ways of the priest, the philosopher, the witness, and the diplomat. The first perspective is typically embodied by conservative (Scheler, Girard) and liberal (Smith, Rawls) political theory, the second by Nietzsche, Deleuze and Foucault, whereas the third is found in the writings of Ame?ry, Fanon and Adorno, and the fourth is the author's own, albeit inspired by philosophers such as Ahmed, Stiegler, Stengers and Sloterdijk. In producing a dialectical sequence between all four typical modes of enunciation, the book seeks to answer the question by what right do we possess and use the concept of ressentiment, and what makes the phenomenon worth knowing? The Dialectic of Ressentiment will be of interest to scholars and advanced students working in critical theory, social and political philosophy, cultural studies, sociology, history, literature, and anthropology. It will also appeal to anyone interested in (public debates on) the politics of anger, discourse ethics, trauma studies, and memory politics"--$cProvided by publisher. 606 $aResentment$xPhilosophy 606 $aDialectic 615 0$aResentment$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aDialectic. 676 $a179/.8 700 $avan Tuinen$b Sjoerd$01256738 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910735090003321 996 $aThe Dialectic of Ressentiment$93430822 997 $aUNINA